Fluentide

A Chinese podcast · Same story, 4 levels

Phone Calls Stole $245 Million in Crypto — episode cover art
3:48

两亿四千五百万美元,一分钱都不是抢来的:一个二十二岁的人打了两年电话,每一笔都是对方自己交出去的

Phone Calls Stole $245 Million in Crypto

About this story

A 22-year-old pleaded guilty in September 2026 to a conspiracy that took more than $245 million in cryptocurrency over two years - one of the largest crypto thefts in US history. Nothing was hacked. Callers impersonated support staff, manufactured trust and urgency, and had victims read their own security codes aloud. Chinese listening practice at four levels. HSK 3 Chinese listening practice.

This is an HSK 3-4 Chinese listening episode that runs about 4 minutes. The full Mandarin script is shown with tap-for-pinyin and a line-by-line English translation, so you can listen and read at once — comprehensible input in the sense of Stephen Krashen's i+1 theory. It teaches 12 key vocabulary words such as 简单、信任、判断力 and walks through 3 grammar patterns, each explained in English with examples. The same news story is retold at 4 difficulty levels — use the level selector above to find the version that is challenging but still understandable for you.

Read at your level

原文

Read the complete story in Chinese. Reveal pinyin and English only when you need them.

先给一个数字:两亿四千五百万美元。
这是美国司法史上金额最大的加密货币盗窃案之一。
案子上个星期有了结果,主犯认罪了。
他今年二十二岁。
接下来我想讲的是这个案子的手法有多简单。
简单到你听完会觉得:这也能成?
先说他们偷的是什么。
不是银行账户里的存款,是加密货币,主要是比特币。
加密货币存在一个叫钱包的地方。
钱包本身不装钱,它装的是一把钥匙。
这把钥匙是一串字符,谁拿到谁就是主人。
没有挂失,没有客服,没有人能帮你把钱追回来。
这个设计的好处是:没有任何机构能冻结你的钱。
坏处是同一件事:也没有任何机构能保护你。
所以针对加密货币的犯罪,重点从来不在破解密码。
重点在于让持有人自己把钥匙交出来。
这套做法有一个专门的名字,叫社会工程学。
名字听起来很高级,做起来就是打电话。
他们的流程大致是这样的。
第一步,先找目标。
链上的转账记录是公开的,谁的钱包里有多少,查得到。
第二步,打电话,冒充一家大公司的工作人员。
在其中一起案子里,他们冒充的是一家搜索公司和一家交易所的客服。
第三步,制造两种情绪。
一是信任:我是官方的,我是来帮你的。
二是紧迫:你的账户现在有异常,我们得马上处理。
这两种情绪同时出现的时候,人的判断力会明显下降。
不是变笨了,是注意力被拉去处理"紧急"这件事了。
第四步,要那串东西。
他们会说:你手机上会收到一组验证码,请念给我。
或者:请你打开某个页面,把上面的内容读一下。
念完,钱包就换主人了。
在这套流程里,有一起是一个人一次损失了四千多个比特币。
他们偶尔也会用更笨的办法,比如直接上门。
但绝大多数金额,是通过电话拿到的。
拿到钱之后的部分就没什么技术含量了。
主犯买了三十多辆车,包括几台定制的跑车。
他买了一块两百万美元的手表。
还有豪宅、包机、夜店里成夜的账单。
这也是他们暴露的原因之一——一个没有收入的年轻人,突然过上这种生活,是很难解释的。
警方追查了一段时间,最后把他抓获。
现在他对参与犯罪集团的指控认罪,最高刑期二十年。
说回我一开始的那个点。
两亿四千五百万美元,一分钱都不是抢来的。
每一笔都是持有人自己交出去的。
这些人不是不懂技术,恰恰相反,能持有这么多加密货币的人,通常相当懂。
真正被攻破的不是钱包,是电话那一头的人在三十秒内的判断。
你想一想:
有人打电话给你,自称是某家公司的客服,说你的账户出了问题,需要你配合。
在那三十秒里,你靠什么判断他是谁?
English transcript reference

Start with a figure: two hundred and forty-five million dollars.

It is one of the largest cryptocurrency thefts in American legal history.

The case reached a resolution last week: the ringleader pleaded guilty.

He is twenty-two years old.

What I want to talk about next is not how bad he is, but how simple the method was.

Simple enough that when you hear it you think: that worked?

First, what they stole.

Not deposits in a bank account — cryptocurrency, mostly bitcoin.

Cryptocurrency sits in something called a wallet.

The wallet itself does not hold money. It holds a key.

That key is a string of characters, and whoever has it is the owner.

There is no reporting it lost, no customer service, nobody who can get your money back for you.

The upside of the design is that no institution can freeze your money.

The downside is the same fact: no institution can protect you either.

So crime aimed at cryptocurrency has almost never gone down the route of breaking the encryption.

The point is to get the holder to hand over the key themselves.

This approach has a name of its own: social engineering.

The name sounds sophisticated. In practice it is a phone call.

Their process ran roughly like this.

Step one: find a target.

On-chain transaction records are public, so who holds how much in which wallet is a matter of record.

Step two: phone them, posing as staff at a large company.

In one of the cases, they posed as customer support from a search company and from an exchange.

Step three: manufacture two emotions.

One is trust: I am official, I am here to help you.

The other is urgency: there is something wrong with your account right now, we need to deal with it immediately.

When those two arrive together, a person's judgement drops noticeably.

Not because they got stupider — their attention has been pulled over to handling the "emergency".

Step four: ask for the string.

They would say: you will receive a verification code on your phone, please read it out to me.

Or: please open a certain page and read out what is on it.

Read it out, and the wallet has a new owner.

In one case in this process, a single person lost over four thousand bitcoin.

Occasionally they used cruder methods, such as turning up at the door.

But the overwhelming majority of the money came in over the phone.

The part after they had the money involves no technical skill at all.

The ringleader bought over thirty cars, including several custom sports cars.

He bought a two-million-dollar watch.

Plus mansions, chartered flights and all-night bills at nightclubs.

This is also one of the reasons they were exposed — a young man with no income suddenly living like that is very hard to explain.

Investigators pursued it for some time and eventually arrested him.

He has now pleaded guilty to participating in a criminal enterprise, with a maximum sentence of twenty years.

Back to the point I opened with.

Two hundred and forty-five million dollars, and not one cent of it was taken by force.

Every last transaction was handed over by the holder.

And these people were not ignorant about technology — quite the opposite: anyone holding that much cryptocurrency usually understands it well.

What was actually breached was not the wallet. It was the judgement of the person on the other end of the phone, over thirty seconds.

Think about it:

Someone calls you claiming to be support at a company you use, says your account has a problem, and needs your cooperation.

In those thirty seconds, what do you actually use to judge who they are?

Listen again

Try it without the transcript and notice what sounds clearer.

What vocabulary does this episode teach?

词汇
jiǎndānsimple

HSK 3. 这个案子的手法有多简单 — the point of the whole episode.

xìnrèntrust

HSK 5. One of the two emotions manufactured on every call.

pànduànlìjudgement

HSK 4 root. 人的判断力会明显下降 — not intelligence, attention.

shèjìdesign

HSK 5. 这个设计的好处是…坏处是同一件事。

zhòngdiǎnthe key point

HSK 5. 重点从来不在破解密码 — where the attack actually goes.

ānquánsecurity

HSK 4. The thing everyone thinks they have, right up until the phone rings.

jiāmì huòbìcryptocurrency

No chargeback, no customer service, no one to recover it for you.

sīyàoprivate key

谁拿到谁就是主人 — possession is ownership, full stop.

shèhuì gōngchéngxuésocial engineering

名字听起来很高级,做起来就是打电话。

màochōngto impersonate

They posed as support at a search company and an exchange.

yànzhèngmǎverification code

The thing the victim reads aloud, at which point control transfers.

jǐnpòurgency

The second manufactured emotion — and the one that removes the thinking.

* beyond level超纲词

What grammar patterns appear in this episode?

语法

好处是……,坏处是同一件事

The advantage is X; the disadvantage is the same fact. A compact way to state a genuine trade-off rather than a fake one.

这个设计的好处是:没有任何机构能冻结你的钱。坏处是同一件事:也没有任何机构能保护你。

第一步……第二步……第三步……

Numbered steps. Announcing the count as you go lets a listener follow a procedure without seeing it written down.

第一步,先找目标。

第二步,打电话,冒充一家大公司的工作人员。

第三步,制造两种情绪。

不是……,是……

Corrects a likely misreading. Used here for the most important claim in the episode: the failure was not cognitive.

不是变笨了,是注意力被拉去处理"紧急"这件事了。

Proper nouns

专有名词
美国Měiguóthe United States

Sources

来源

Free account

Keep learning from this story

Create a free account to keep saved words and your preferred level together.

  • Keep words with their story context
  • Remember your preferred level
  • Build your vocabulary over time

Keep learning