A Chinese podcast · Same story, 4 levels
两亿四千五百万美元，一分钱都不是抢来的：一个二十二岁的人打了两年电话，每一笔都是对方自己交出去的
Not One Cent of the $245 Million Was Taken by Force: a 22-Year-Old Spent Two Years on the Phone, and Every Victim Handed It Over Themselves
About this story
A 22-year-old pleaded guilty in September 2026 to a conspiracy that took more than $245 million in cryptocurrency over two years - one of the largest crypto thefts in US history. Nothing was hacked. Callers impersonated support staff, manufactured trust and urgency, and had victims read their own security codes aloud. Chinese listening practice at four levels. HSK 3 Chinese listening practice.
This is an HSK 3-4 Chinese listening episode that runs about 4 minutes. The full Mandarin script is shown with tap-for-pinyin and a line-by-line English translation, so you can listen and read at once — comprehensible input in the sense of Stephen Krashen's i+1 theory. It teaches 12 key vocabulary words such as 简单、信任、判断力 and walks through 3 grammar patterns, each explained in English with examples. The same news story is retold at 4 difficulty levels — use the level selector above to find the version that is challenging but still understandable for you.
Read at your level
原文Read the complete story in Chinese. Reveal pinyin and English only when you need them.
English transcript reference
Start with a figure: two hundred and forty-five million dollars.
It is one of the largest cryptocurrency thefts in American legal history.
The case reached a resolution last week: the ringleader pleaded guilty.
He is twenty-two years old.
What I want to talk about next is not how bad he is, but how simple the method was.
Simple enough that when you hear it you think: that worked?
First, what they stole.
Not deposits in a bank account — cryptocurrency, mostly bitcoin.
Cryptocurrency sits in something called a wallet.
The wallet itself does not hold money. It holds a key.
That key is a string of characters, and whoever has it is the owner.
There is no reporting it lost, no customer service, nobody who can get your money back for you.
The upside of the design is that no institution can freeze your money.
The downside is the same fact: no institution can protect you either.
So crime aimed at cryptocurrency has almost never gone down the route of breaking the encryption.
The point is to get the holder to hand over the key themselves.
This approach has a name of its own: social engineering.
The name sounds sophisticated. In practice it is a phone call.
Their process ran roughly like this.
Step one: find a target.
On-chain transaction records are public, so who holds how much in which wallet is a matter of record.
Step two: phone them, posing as staff at a large company.
In one of the cases, they posed as customer support from a search company and from an exchange.
Step three: manufacture two emotions.
One is trust: I am official, I am here to help you.
The other is urgency: there is something wrong with your account right now, we need to deal with it immediately.
When those two arrive together, a person's judgement drops noticeably.
Not because they got stupider — their attention has been pulled over to handling the "emergency".
Step four: ask for the string.
They would say: you will receive a verification code on your phone, please read it out to me.
Or: please open a certain page and read out what is on it.
Read it out, and the wallet has a new owner.
In one case in this process, a single person lost over four thousand bitcoin.
Occasionally they used cruder methods, such as turning up at the door.
But the overwhelming majority of the money came in over the phone.
The part after they had the money involves no technical skill at all.
The ringleader bought over thirty cars, including several custom sports cars.
He bought a two-million-dollar watch.
Plus mansions, chartered flights and all-night bills at nightclubs.
This is also one of the reasons they were exposed — a young man with no income suddenly living like that is very hard to explain.
Investigators pursued it for some time and eventually arrested him.
He has now pleaded guilty to participating in a criminal enterprise, with a maximum sentence of twenty years.
Back to the point I opened with.
Two hundred and forty-five million dollars, and not one cent of it was taken by force.
Every last transaction was handed over by the holder.
And these people were not ignorant about technology — quite the opposite: anyone holding that much cryptocurrency usually understands it well.
What was actually breached was not the wallet. It was the judgement of the person on the other end of the phone, over thirty seconds.
Think about it:
Someone calls you claiming to be support at a company you use, says your account has a problem, and needs your cooperation.
In those thirty seconds, what do you actually use to judge who they are?
Listen again
Try it without the transcript and notice what sounds clearer.
What vocabulary does this episode teach?
词汇HSK 3. 这个案子的手法有多简单 — the point of the whole episode.
HSK 5. One of the two emotions manufactured on every call.
HSK 4 root. 人的判断力会明显下降 — not intelligence, attention.
HSK 5. 这个设计的好处是…坏处是同一件事。
HSK 5. 重点从来不在破解密码 — where the attack actually goes.
HSK 4. The thing everyone thinks they have, right up until the phone rings.
No chargeback, no customer service, no one to recover it for you.
谁拿到谁就是主人 — possession is ownership, full stop.
名字听起来很高级，做起来就是打电话。
They posed as support at a search company and an exchange.
The thing the victim reads aloud, at which point control transfers.
The second manufactured emotion — and the one that removes the thinking.
* beyond level超纲词
What grammar patterns appear in this episode?
语法好处是……，坏处是同一件事
The advantage is X; the disadvantage is the same fact. A compact way to state a genuine trade-off rather than a fake one.
这个设计的好处是：没有任何机构能冻结你的钱。坏处是同一件事：也没有任何机构能保护你。
第一步……第二步……第三步……
Numbered steps. Announcing the count as you go lets a listener follow a procedure without seeing it written down.
第一步，先找目标。
第二步，打电话，冒充一家大公司的工作人员。
第三步，制造两种情绪。
不是……，是……
Corrects a likely misreading. Used here for the most important claim in the episode: the failure was not cognitive.
不是变笨了，是注意力被拉去处理"紧急"这件事了。
Proper Nouns
专有名词Sources
来源Free account
Keep learning from this story
Create a free account to keep saved words and your preferred level together.
- Keep words with their story context
- Remember your preferred level
- Build your vocabulary over time