A Chinese podcast · Same story, 4 levels
LinkedIn 加了一个"这看着像 AI 写的"按钮。三个星期，被点了一百万次。
LinkedIn Added a "Seems Like AI Slop" Button. It Was Clicked a Million Times in Three Weeks.
About this story
LinkedIn Added a "Seems Like AI Slop" Button. It Was Clicked a Million Times in Three Weeks. HSK 3 Chinese listening practice.
This is an HSK 3-4 Chinese listening episode that runs about 2 minutes. The full Mandarin script is shown with tap-for-pinyin and a line-by-line English translation, so you can listen and read at once — comprehensible input in the sense of Stephen Krashen's i+1 theory. It teaches 8 key vocabulary words such as 读、句、条 and walks through 3 grammar patterns, each explained in English with examples. The same news story is retold at 4 difficulty levels — use the level selector above to find the version that is challenging but still understandable for you.
Read at your level
原文Read the complete story in Chinese. Reveal pinyin and English only when you need them.
English transcript reference
On the website LinkedIn, people write posts — about work, about ideas.
They all used to be written by people. Not any more.
Now a great many posts are machine-generated, and when you read one you may well not be able to tell.
The sentences run properly, the structure is tidy.
But when you finish, you get a feeling you cannot quite name: as though you had seen it somewhere before.
On the thirtieth of July, LinkedIn added a button — inside the three dots on every post, carrying one sentence: this seems like AI slop.
Whichever post strikes you as machine-written, you press it, and that counts as a report.
Three weeks later, the figure came out: more than a million.
More than a million people pressed the same button.
Was it any use?
LinkedIn says it was: they put the reports together with their own classification system and retuned the whole thing.
The result: content judged to be machine-generated lost forty percent of its views.
And there is another figure worth pausing on: a detection company sampled the longer posts on LinkedIn.
Out of a hundred, forty-one were entirely machine-generated.
Not a person writing and a machine polishing — machine-written from beginning to end.
So that button is really an unorganised act of collective statement.
More than a million people each read a post, each arrived at the same judgement, and each reached out and pressed the same place.
The most interesting part is that nobody taught them how to tell: no course, no instructions, no correct answer.
They simply read, and read, and felt something was off.
Think about it:
You read a passage — can you tell whether a machine wrote it?
Listen again
Try it without the transcript and notice what sounds clearer.
What vocabulary does this episode teach?
词汇They simply 读着读着 — read, and read, and felt something was off.
写着一句话 — carrying one sentence.
每条帖子 — every post. 哪条 — which one.
你觉得哪条像机器写的 — whichever one strikes you as machine-written.
Hidden inside the three dots on every post.
点一下，等于举报。
机器生成的 — machine-generated. The standard term for AI output.
Used figuratively for the quality that machine text lacks.
* beyond level超纲词
What grammar patterns appear in this episode?
语法各自……，各自……，各自……
Each one separately did X, Y, Z — stresses that it happened independently.
一百多万人各自读到一条帖子，各自产生了同一个判断，各自伸手点了同一个地方。
读着读着
Reduplicated verb + 着: while going on doing something, gradually something happens.
他们只是读着读着，觉得不对。 — They simply read on, and felt something was off.
等于
Amounts to, is equivalent to.
点一下，等于举报。 — Pressing it amounts to reporting it.
Proper Nouns
专有名词Sources
来源Free account
Keep learning from this story
Create a free account to keep saved words and your preferred level together.
- Keep words with their story context
- Remember your preferred level
- Build your vocabulary over time