Fluentide

A Chinese podcast · Same story, 4 levels

LinkedIn Added a "Seems Like AI Slop" Button. It Was Clicked a Million Times in Three Weeks. — episode cover art
2:14

LinkedIn " AI "

LinkedIn Added a "Seems Like AI Slop" Button. It Was Clicked a Million Times in Three Weeks.

About this story

LinkedIn Added a "Seems Like AI Slop" Button. It Was Clicked a Million Times in Three Weeks. HSK 5-6 Chinese listening practice.

This is an HSK 5-6 Chinese listening episode that runs about 2 minutes. The full Mandarin script is shown with tap-for-pinyin and a line-by-line English translation, so you can listen and read at once — comprehensible input in the sense of Stephen Krashen's i+1 theory. It teaches 10 key vocabulary words such as 读、数字、条 and walks through 3 grammar patterns, each explained in English with examples. The same news story is retold at 4 difficulty levels — use the level selector above to find the version that is challenging but still understandable for you.

Read at your level

原文

Read the complete story in Chinese. Reveal pinyin and English only when you need them.

LinkedIn 这个网站
上面帖子工作想法自己一年做成什么
以前这些帖子都是写的
现在不是
七月三十LinkedIn 帖子加了一个选项
上面一句非常的话 AI 生成
觉得机器写的一下等于
星期之后数字出来一百
一百万人按下一个按钮
有用
LinkedIn 有用
他们这些自己判定系统在一起重新调了一遍
结果判定机器生成内容浏览下降
还有一个数字值得一下
一家 Pangram Labs 检测公司抽查 LinkedIn
一百四十一篇完全 AI 生成
不是 AI 从头机器写的
不是写的消化比例
真正在意那一百万本身
因为意味一百万人各自一条帖子各自产生一个判断各自伸手点了一个地方
而且没有教过他们怎么分辨
没有课程没有说明没有标准答案
他们只是觉得不对
句子结构标点没错就是没有味道
这个能力奇怪因为说不清楚
没法写成规则交给别人
一百说明很多身上同时存在
所以真正意义可能在于 LinkedIn 掉了多少内容
在于这种说不清判断第一次变成一个可以出来东西
百万就是百万个人一句这个不想
你想一想
一段能看出来是不是机器写的
English transcript reference

First, about the website LinkedIn.

People write posts on it: about work, about ideas, about what they got done this year.

These posts all used to be written by people.

Not any more.

On the thirtieth of July, LinkedIn added a new option inside the three dots on every post.

It carries an extremely blunt sentence: this seems like AI slop.

Whichever post strikes you as machine-written, press it, and that counts as a report.

Three weeks later the figure came out: more than a million.

More than a million people pressed the same button.

Was it any use?

LinkedIn says it was.

They took those reports, put them together with their own classification system, and retuned the whole thing.

The result: content judged to be machine-generated lost forty percent of its views.

And there is another figure worth pausing on.

A detection company called Pangram Labs sampled the longer posts on LinkedIn.

Out of a hundred, forty-one were entirely generated by AI.

Not a person writing and AI polishing — machine-written from beginning to end.

Forty percent of long posts not written by a person is a hard proportion to digest.

But what actually stays with me is that million clicks itself.

Because what it means is this: more than a million people each read a post, each arrived at the same judgement, and each reached out and pressed the same place.

And nobody taught them how to tell.

No course, no manual, no correct answer.

They simply read, and read, and felt something was off.

The sentences run properly, the structure is tidy, the punctuation is not wrong — and still there is no flavour.

It is a strange ability, because it cannot be articulated.

You cannot write it into a rule and hand it to somebody else.

But a million clicks show that it exists in a great many people at once.

So the real significance of this may not be how much content LinkedIn cleared away.

It is that it turned this inarticulate judgement into something that could, for the first time, be counted.

A million times is a million people saying the same sentence: I do not want to read this.

Think about it:

You read a passage — can you tell whether a machine wrote it?

Listen again

Try it without the transcript and notice what sounds clearer.

What vocabulary does this episode teach?

词汇
to read

The ability at the centre of this: what people notice while reading.

shùzìa figure, a number

三个星期之后,数字出来了。

tiáomeasure word for posts

每条帖子 — every post.

measure word for sentences

一句非常直白的话 — one extremely blunt sentence.

ràngto make, to let

它让这种说不清的判断,第一次变成可以被数出来的东西。

ànniǔa button

The object, and the point.

jǔbàoto report

What a click counts as.

shēngchéngto generate

AI 生成的 — AI-generated.

rùnsèto polish (writing)

Not a person writing and AI 润色 — machine-written throughout.

liúlǎnliàngview count

浏览量下降了四成 — views fell forty percent.

* beyond level超纲词

What grammar patterns appear in this episode?

语法

不在于……,在于……

The significance lies not in X but in Y.

真正的意义,可能不在于清掉了多少内容。在于它让这种判断第一次变成可以被数出来的东西。

没法把它写成……交给别人

Cannot be reduced to a form and handed over — used for tacit knowledge.

你没法把它写成规则交给别人。

意味着

Means, signifies — more formal than 就是说.

因为它意味着:一百多万人各自读到一条帖子。

Proper Nouns

专有名词
LinkedInLinkedInLinkedIn, the professional networking sitePangram LabsPangram Labsthe AI-detection company that sampled the postsAIAIartificial intelligence

Sources

来源

Free account

Keep learning from this story

Create a free account to keep saved words and your preferred level together.

  • Keep words with their story context
  • Remember your preferred level
  • Build your vocabulary over time

Continue with Fluentide