Fluentide

A Chinese podcast · Same story, 4 levels

Jury Mistakes Reese Witherspoon for a Real Lawyer — episode cover art
2:50

陪审员选她当陪审长,理由是「你上过法学院」:可她只是在《律政俏佳人》里演过律师,连大学都没念完

Jury Mistakes Reese Witherspoon for a Real Lawyer

About this story

Reese Witherspoon told The Graham Norton Show that about seven years after Legally Blonde she did two weeks of jury duty in Beverly Hills on a dog-bite case, and her fellow jurors elected her foreman because they thought she had gone to law school. She told them she had not, and had not finished college. Chinese listening practice at four levels. HSK 2 Chinese listening practice.

This is an HSK 2 Chinese listening episode that runs about 3 minutes. The full Mandarin script is shown with tap-for-pinyin and a line-by-line English translation, so you can listen and read at once — comprehensible input in the sense of Stephen Krashen's i+1 theory. It teaches 12 key vocabulary words such as 演员、意外、发现 and walks through 3 grammar patterns, each explained in English with examples. The same news story is retold at 4 difficulty levels — use the level selector above to find the version that is challenging but still understandable for you.

Read at your level

原文

Read the complete story in Chinese. Reveal pinyin and English only when you need them.

今天说一个美国演员的事。
这件事是她自己讲的。
她很有名,演过很多电影。
二十多年前,她演了一部电影。
那部电影里,她是一个学法律的女孩子。
一开始,大家都觉得她只会打扮,不会念书。
可是她考进了很好的学校。
后来她做了律师,还赢了一个案子。
这部电影很红。
过了二十多年,还是很多人看。
可是电影就是电影。
她本人没有学过法律。
她自己说:我连大学都没有念完。
好,现在说这件事。
在美国,普通人有时候会被叫去法院。
去做什么呢?
去当陪审员。
陪审员是做什么的?
简单说,法官管法律,陪审员管事情。
一件事到底有没有发生,是他们来定的。
每个人都可能被叫去,有名的人也一样。
电影出来七年以后,她被叫去了。
案子不大,是一个狗咬人的案子。
她去了两个星期。
第一天,陪审员要先选一个人出来。
这个人在前面主持,最后代表大家说话。
大家看了看,就选了她。
她很意外。
她问:为什么是我?
他们说:因为你上过法学院啊。
她说:我没有上过法学院。
她说:我真的没有上过。
她说:我连大学都没有念完。
可是他们已经这么定了。
在他们看来,她在电影里当过律师,那她就懂法律。
她后来讲这件事的时候,说了几句话。
她说:我只是在一部电影里演过律师。
她说:可是他们真的让我坐在前面。
她说:那时候我才发现,很多人不太懂法律是怎么回事。
我觉得这件事好笑,也让人想一想。
好笑的地方是:演过,就被当成懂。
让人想一想的地方是:那是一个真的案子。
有一个人的事,就交给了这几个人。
而他们选头儿的时候,用的是一部电影。
你想一想:
你有没有因为在什么地方见过一个人,就觉得他懂?
你是怎么知道他懂的?
English transcript reference

Today's story is about an American actress.

She told it herself.

She is very famous, and she has been in a lot of films.

More than twenty years ago, she was in one film.

In that film she played a young woman studying law.

At the start, everyone thinks she only knows how to dress up and cannot study.

But she gets into a very good school.

Later she becomes a lawyer, and she wins a case.

That film was a hit.

More than twenty years on, a lot of people are still watching it.

But a film is a film.

She herself has never studied law.

As she puts it: I did not even finish college.

All right, now for what happened.

In America, ordinary people are sometimes called to court.

Called to do what?

To serve on a jury.

What does a juror do?

Put simply: the judge handles the law, the jury handles the facts.

Whether a thing actually happened is for them to decide.

Anyone can be called, famous people included.

Seven years after the film came out, she was called.

It was not a big case — a dog bite case.

She was there for two weeks.

On the first day, the jurors had to choose one of themselves.

That person sits at the front, runs the discussion, and speaks for everyone at the end.

They all looked around and chose her.

She was taken aback.

She asked: why me?

They said: because you went to law school.

She said: I did not go to law school.

She said: really, I did not.

She said: I did not even finish college.

But they had already decided.

As they saw it, she had been a lawyer in a film, so she knew the law.

When she told this story later, she said a few things.

She said: I only played a lawyer in one film.

She said: and they really did sit me at the front.

She said: that was when I realised how many people do not understand how the law works.

I find this funny, and also worth a thought.

The funny part is: she acted it, so she was taken to know it.

The part worth a thought is: it was a real case.

One person's business was handed to those few people.

And when they picked their leader, what they used was a film.

Think about it:

Have you ever assumed someone knows their subject because of where you saw them?

How did you know they knew?

Listen again

Try it without the transcript and notice what sounds clearer.

What vocabulary does this episode teach?

词汇
yǎnyuánactor, actress

The profession at the centre of the mix-up.

yìwàiunexpected, surprised

HSK 4. 她很意外 — she asked the question nobody else thought to.

fāxiànto realise, discover

HSK 3. 那时候我才发现 — what she took away from the two weeks.

pǔtōngordinary

HSK 4. 普通人有时候会被叫去法院 — jury duty falls on anybody.

dàibiǎoto represent

HSK 4. 最后代表大家说话 — what the foreman actually does.

fāshēngto happen, occur

HSK 4. 一件事到底有没有发生 — the jury's one job, stated plainly.

fǎlǜlaw

The subject she was assumed to have studied.

lǜshīlawyer

HSK 5. 她在电影里当过律师,那她就懂法律 — the whole faulty inference.

fǎyuàncourt

Where ordinary people get called, famous ones included.

fǎguānjudge

法官管法律,陪审员管事情 — the division that makes the system work.

péishěnyuánjuror

Explained from scratch before the story needs it.

ànzicase

一个狗咬人的案子 — small, ordinary, and completely real.

* beyond level超纲词

What grammar patterns appear in this episode?

语法

被 + verb

The passive. Chinese uses 被 far less than English uses "was", saving it for things that happen to you — which is exactly what jury duty is.

普通人有时候会被叫去法院。

电影出来七年以后,她被叫去了。

连……都……↗

Even. 连 fronts the most extreme case and 都 confirms it, which is why this is the strongest way she can deny the assumption.

我连大学都没有念完。

在……看来

In X's view. Attributes a belief to someone without endorsing it — essential when reporting reasoning you think is wrong.

在他们看来,她在电影里当过律师,那她就懂法律。

Proper nouns

专有名词
美国Měiguóthe United States

Sources

来源

Free account

Keep learning from this story

Create a free account to keep saved words and your preferred level together.

  • Keep words with their story context
  • Remember your preferred level
  • Build your vocabulary over time

Keep learning