Fluentide

A Chinese podcast · Same story, 4 levels

Ticketmaster Monopoly Ruling Orders Refunds — episode cover art
6:16

Ticketmaster垄断了:法院说你被多收钱了

Ticketmaster Monopoly Ruling Orders Refunds

About this story

A US court finds Ticketmaster and Live Nation violated the Sherman Antitrust Act — Eras Tour buyers were overcharged. HSK 3 Chinese listening practice.

This is an HSK 3-4 Chinese listening episode that runs about 6 minutes. The full Mandarin script is shown with tap-for-pinyin and a line-by-line English translation, so you can listen and read at once — comprehensible input in the sense of Stephen Krashen's i+1 theory. It teaches 12 key vocabulary words such as 世界、机会、结果 and walks through 3 grammar patterns, each explained in English with examples. The same news story is retold at 4 difficulty levels — use the level selector above to find the version that is challenging but still understandable for you.

Read at your level

原文

Read the complete story in Chinese. Reveal pinyin and English only when you need them.

说到美国这几天最让普通人开心的新闻,可能就是Ticketmaster被判垄断了。
如果你在美国买过演唱会门票。
你一定用过Ticketmaster。
因为你几乎没有别的选择。
这就是问题所在。
四月十五号。
曼哈顿联邦法院的一个陪审团做出了判决。
Live Nation和旗下的Ticketmaster违反了反垄断法。
它们在演唱会门票市场上构成了非法垄断。
而且它们多收了消费者的钱。
这个案子有三十三个州加上华盛顿特区联合起诉。
一共审了五个星期。
陪审团商量了四天。
最后在每一个关键的法律问题上都判了原告胜诉。
这是一个全面的败诉。
对Live Nation来说几乎是灾难性的。
我们先说一下为什么这个案子这么重要。
Live Nation是什么公司?
它是全世界最大的现场娱乐公司。
它做三件事。
第一它办演唱会。
是全世界最大的演唱会推广商。
第二它管理场地。
美国最好的露天剧场很多都是它的。
第三它卖票。
Ticketmaster控制了美国大概百分之八十的一级票务市场。
一级市场就是第一次卖票。
不是二手转卖。
百分之八十。
这个数字意味着什么?
意味着如果你是一个歌手。
你想在大场地办演唱会。
你几乎必须跟Live Nation合作。
因为好场地是它的。
你用它的场地就必须用Ticketmaster卖票。
因为场地被绑定了。
如果你是一个买票的人。
你想看这个歌手。
你只能去Ticketmaster。
因为票只在那里卖。
这就是所谓的"纵向垄断"。
从上到下全控制了。
场地是我的。
推广是我的。
卖票也是我的。
你在这个链条上的每一个环节都要经过我。
Ticketmaster最被大家恨的是什么?
服务费。
你可能看到一张票标价一百美元。
但是等你付钱的时候发现。
加上服务费一共是一百三十。
甚至一百五十。
那多出来的三十到五十块是什么?
是"方便费""处理费""设施费"。
名目各种各样。
但本质都是一样的。
就是Ticketmaster额外收你的钱。
这些钱合理吗?
陪审团说不合理。
他们计算出来每张票平均被多收了一块七毛二美元。
一块七听起来不多。
但是美国每年通过Ticketmaster卖出几亿张票。
乘以一块七。
那就是一笔天文数字。
这个案子的导火索是什么?
是Taylor Swift。
二零二二年十一月。
Taylor Swift的Eras Tour开始预售。
Ticketmaster的系统崩了。
几百万人同时涌入。
排了好几个小时。
很多人最后还是买不到票。
社交媒体上一片愤怒。
美国参议院甚至为此开了听证会。
那是Ticketmaster公关史上最黑暗的一天。
也是这个反垄断案的起点。
二零二四年五月。
美国司法部和三十多个州联合起诉Live Nation。
起诉理由是违反了《谢尔曼反垄断法》。
这个法律是一八九零年就有的。
是美国最古老的反垄断法。
它说一个公司不可以用不正当手段控制市场。
案子在今年三月开始审。
审了五个星期。
有一个有趣的转折。
审到第一个星期的时候。
司法部和几个州跟Live Nation达成了一个单独的和解。
Live Nation同意赔两亿八千万美元。
同意在某些场地限制服务费。
同意让场地在选择票务平台方面有更多自由。
但是剩下的三十三个州没有接受和解。
他们说这不够。
他们要的是陪审团判决。
他们要的是法律上的确认:你是垄断。
四月十五号他们得到了这个确认。
陪审团在每一个关键问题上都投了"是"。
是的Live Nation垄断了一级票务市场。
是的它垄断了大型露天剧场市场。
是的它把场地使用和票务服务非法捆绑。
全面胜诉。
纽约州检察长Letitia James说。
"Live Nation和Ticketmaster违了法。
让消费者损失了几百万美元。
现在最关键的问题是接下来会发生什么。
法官Arun Subramanian要决定补救措施。
最大的可能性是什么?
是拆分。
就是强制Live Nation把Ticketmaster卖掉。
让卖票的公司和办演唱会的公司不是同一个人。
这是很多批评者呼吁了多年的事情。
如果真的拆了。
其他的票务公司就有机会竞争。
有竞争就有可能降价。
服务费就有可能降下来。
Live Nation说他们要上诉。
他们说判决还没有最终确定。
他们不承认自己是垄断。
但是不管上诉结果如何。
这个判决已经发出了一个很清楚的信号。
你控制百分之八十的市场。
你把场地和票务绑在一起。
你多收消费者的钱。
法律不允许。
对所有买过票的人来说。
这一天等了很久了。
English transcript reference

Speaking of the news that made ordinary Americans happiest these past few days, it's probably Ticketmaster being ruled a monopoly.

If you've ever bought concert tickets in America.

You've definitely used Ticketmaster.

Because you had almost no other choice.

That's the problem.

On April 15th.

A jury at the Manhattan federal court reached a verdict.

Live Nation and its subsidiary Ticketmaster violated antitrust law.

They constituted an illegal monopoly in the concert ticket market.

And they overcharged consumers.

This case was brought by 33 states plus Washington DC together.

The trial lasted five weeks total.

The jury deliberated for four days.

In the end they ruled for the plaintiffs on every key legal question.

This was a total defeat.

Almost catastrophic for Live Nation.

Let's first talk about why this case is so important.

What kind of company is Live Nation?

It's the biggest live entertainment company in the world.

It does three things.

First, it organizes concerts.

It's the world's largest concert promoter.

Second, it manages venues.

Many of America's best amphitheaters belong to it.

Third, it sells tickets.

Ticketmaster controls about 80% of America's primary ticketing market.

The primary market means selling tickets for the first time.

Not resale.

Eighty percent.

What does this number mean?

It means if you're a singer.

You want to hold a concert at a big venue.

You almost have to work with Live Nation.

Because the good venues are theirs.

If you use their venue you must use Ticketmaster to sell tickets.

Because the venue is tied to it.

If you're a ticket buyer.

You want to see this singer.

You can only go to Ticketmaster.

Because tickets are only sold there.

This is called "vertical monopoly."

Control from top to bottom.

The venue is mine.

The promotion is mine.

The ticket selling is also mine.

Every link in this chain goes through me.

What do people hate most about Ticketmaster?

Service fees.

You might see a ticket priced at one hundred dollars.

But when you go to pay you discover.

With service fees it's actually one hundred thirty.

Even one hundred fifty.

What's that extra thirty to fifty dollars?

It's "convenience fee" "processing fee" "facility fee."

All sorts of different names.

But the essence is the same.

It's extra money Ticketmaster charges you.

Are these charges reasonable?

The jury said no.

They calculated that each ticket was overcharged by an average of one dollar and seventy-two cents.

One seventy-two doesn't sound like much.

But America sells hundreds of millions of tickets through Ticketmaster every year.

Times one seventy-two.

That's an astronomical figure.

What triggered this case?

Taylor Swift.

November 2022.

Taylor Swift's Eras Tour started presales.

Ticketmaster's system crashed.

Millions of people flooded in at once.

Waited for hours.

Many people still couldn't buy tickets in the end.

Social media was full of anger.

The US Senate even held a hearing about it.

That was the darkest day in Ticketmaster's PR history.

And the starting point of this antitrust case.

May 2024.

The US Department of Justice and over thirty states filed a joint lawsuit against Live Nation.

The charge was violating the Sherman Antitrust Act.

This law has existed since 1890.

It's America's oldest antitrust law.

It says a company cannot use unfair means to control a market.

The case started trial in March this year.

Lasted five weeks.

There was an interesting twist.

During the first week of trial.

The DOJ and some states reached a separate settlement with Live Nation.

Live Nation agreed to pay 280 million dollars.

Agreed to limit service fees at certain venues.

Agreed to give venues more freedom in choosing ticketing platforms.

But the remaining 33 states didn't accept the settlement.

They said it wasn't enough.

What they wanted was a jury verdict.

What they wanted was legal confirmation: you are a monopoly.

On April 15th they got that confirmation.

The jury voted "yes" on every key question.

Yes, Live Nation monopolized the primary ticketing market.

Yes, it monopolized the large amphitheater market.

Yes, it illegally bundled venue use with ticketing services.

Complete victory for the plaintiffs.

New York Attorney General Letitia James said.

"Live Nation and Ticketmaster broke the law."

"Costing consumers millions of dollars."

Now the most critical question is what happens next.

Judge Arun Subramanian must decide on remedies.

What's the most likely outcome?

A breakup.

Meaning forcing Live Nation to sell off Ticketmaster.

Making the ticket seller and the concert organizer not the same entity.

This is what many critics have called for over the years.

If it really gets broken up.

Other ticketing companies would have a chance to compete.

With competition, prices could drop.

Service fees could come down.

Live Nation says they will appeal.

They say the verdict isn't final yet.

They don't admit they're a monopoly.

But regardless of the appeal outcome.

This verdict has sent a very clear signal.

You control eighty percent of the market.

You bundle venues with ticketing.

You overcharge consumers.

The law doesn't allow it.

For everyone who has ever bought a ticket.

They've been waiting a long time for this day.

Listen again

Try it without the transcript and notice what sounds clearer.

What vocabulary does this episode teach?

词汇
shìjièworld

HSK 1-3. world.

jīhuìchance

HSK 1-3. chance.

jiéguǒresult; outcome

HSK 1-3. result; outcome.

fǎlǜlaw

HSK 1-3. law.

fāxiànto discover / to find

HSK 1-3. to discover / to find.

tóngyìto agree / to consent

HSK 1-3. to agree / to consent.

lǒngduànmonopoly

Illegal market dominance by one company.

zòngxiàng lǒngduànvertical monopoly

Controlling multiple stages of a supply chain.

yī jí piàowùprimary ticketing

First sale of tickets (not resale).

lùtiān jùchǎngamphitheater

An outdoor performance venue.

fāngbiàn fèiconvenience fee

One of many extra charges on ticket purchases.

dǎohuǒsuǒtrigger; fuse

The event that set off a larger chain of events.

* beyond level超纲词

What grammar patterns appear in this episode?

语法
所谓的...↗

So-called...

这就是所谓的纵向垄断。

不管...都/也...↗

Regardless of...

不管上诉结果如何,这个判决已经发出了信号。

从...开始/到...↗

Starting from...

从Pearl Jam九十年代抵制开始。

Proper nouns

专有名词
TicketmasterTicketmasterTicketmasterLive NationLive NationLive NationTaylor SwiftTaylor SwiftTaylor SwiftEras TourEras TourEras Tour (Taylor Swift concert tour)谢尔曼反垄断法Xiè ěrmàn fǎn lǒngduàn fǎSherman Antitrust ActLetitia JamesLetitia JamesLetitia James (NY Attorney General)Arun SubramanianArun SubramanianJudge Arun Subramanian曼哈顿MànhādùnManhattan

Sources

来源

Free account

Keep learning from this story

Create a free account to keep saved words and your preferred level together.

  • Keep words with their story context
  • Remember your preferred level
  • Build your vocabulary over time

Keep learning