A Chinese podcast · Same story, 4 levels

七万五千字辞职信背后:钉钉换帅,与阿里的自我拷问
Behind a 75,000-Character Resignation Letter: DingTalk's Leadership Change and Alibaba's Self-Reckoning
About this story
Advanced Chinese listening practice. The full story of the DingTalk resignation-letter saga: Teng Yaxin's 'Inside DingTalk', Ma Ruila's echo from 'Outside DingTalk', Alibaba's Partners Committee rebuke, Chen Hang's exit and Chen Yusen's rise, the AI reorganization behind it, and the question that cuts at every overworked person: are we creating value, or just performing effort? HSK 5-6 Chinese listening practice.
This is an HSK 5-6 Chinese listening episode that runs about 6 minutes. The full Mandarin script is shown with tap-for-pinyin and a line-by-line English translation, so you can listen and read at once — comprehensible input in the sense of Stephen Krashen's i+1 theory. It teaches 14 key vocabulary words such as 辞职信、商业、网络 and walks through 7 grammar patterns, each explained in English with examples. The same news story is retold at 4 difficulty levels — use the level selector above to find the version that is challenging but still understandable for you.
Read at your level
原文Read the complete story in Chinese. Reveal pinyin and English only when you need them.
English transcript reference
Today we'll talk about something that has basically flooded the Chinese internet these past few days.
A resignation letter toppled a big company's CEO.
The protagonist of the story is DingTalk.
You're probably not unfamiliar with DingTalk.
In China, it's a tool that working people open almost every day.
Sending messages, video meetings, clocking in, approvals — it's all on there.
You can think of it as a 'corporate version of WeChat'.
And behind DingTalk is Alibaba.
That is, one of China's largest internet companies.
The starting point of this whole thing is one person.
His name is Teng Yaxin; his nickname is 'Yousu'.
He was the product manager of one of DingTalk's core AI products.
This AI product once reached three million daily active users.
It sounds successful.
But later, this project was step by step scaled back and cut.
On June 4, Teng Yaxin chose to leave.
On Alibaba's internal network, he posted a long resignation essay.
Titled 'Inside DingTalk'.
This letter ran a full seventy-five thousand characters.
At that length, it's no longer an ordinary resignation letter.
It's more like a complete retrospective report.
He wrote out that AI project — from inception, to explosion, to its final end —
completely and in full.
He used many oblique, somewhat literary turns of phrase,
but the core thrust was very clear.
First, the team was steeped in a culture of 'pleasing those above'.
When people did their work, the first priority wasn't the user,
but satisfying the leaders.
Second, vicious internal competition was severe; people wore each other down.
Third, many decisions were based on leaders' personal preferences,
rather than genuine strategic judgment.
Fourth, there was meaningless overtime, and the collective burnout that came with it.
After this letter came out, it spread rapidly inside Alibaba.
Many employees' reaction was:
'What he wrote is exactly our daily life.'
On June 8, another heavyweight figure stepped forward.
Ma Ruila, DingTalk's former vice president and head of AI products,
on his own public account,
posted an echoing article, titled 'Outside DingTalk'.
He confirmed the various conditions Teng Yaxin described.
He also said something piercing.
He said that during that period he could, at one point, no longer tell
whether he was actually creating a product,
or just, utterly exhausted,
chasing a pace that was forever receding.
These two articles — one inside, one outside — corroborated each other.
Public opinion was completely set ablaze.
On June 10, Alibaba's Partners Committee
specifically posted an internal response.
The title was meaningful,
roughly: 'Warmth, loyalty, and growth — that's the culture Alibaba should have.'
This amounted to Alibaba's highest level
publicly rejecting DingTalk's style of management.
And the real main event was on June 11.
Alibaba announced that DingTalk CEO Chen Hang was stepping down.
The name Chen Hang — people in the know all recognize it.
His nickname is 'Wuzhao'.
DingTalk, the product, was originally built single-handedly by him.
You could say he is DingTalk's soul.
Later, he left once.
In March 2025, he returned and took the helm of DingTalk again.
But this return lasted only a little over four hundred days.
Now, he departs once more.
Taking his place is a fairly young person, named Chen Yusen.
He was born in 1992, and is only thirty-four this year.
In one stroke he became Alibaba's youngest business-unit CEO.
Chen Yusen is no ordinary person.
At 22 he started a company, doing cybersecurity.
His company was later acquired by Alibaba Cloud.
In 2025, he made an AI Agent product,
with users in over forty countries abroad,
and reportedly found a working business model quickly.
So Alibaba choosing him sends a very clear signal:
to use a younger person — more fluent in AI, more like an entrepreneur —
to give DingTalk a transfusion of new blood.
Speaking of which, let's step back and look at the bigger picture.
DingTalk's leadership change is not an isolated event.
It's part of Alibaba's whole-year
major organizational restructuring around AI.
The old architecture, divided by department and function,
is being broken up and recombined.
So, what exactly does this leave us with?
I think there are at least two points worth remembering.
The first point is about the power of truth.
A product manager with no rank and no power,
simply, earnestly, and completely, wrote down the truth he saw.
And it moved the personnel of a trillion-dollar company.
In any era, that is rare.
It reminds us: the truth itself has weight.
It's just that, most of the time,
we all choose silence,
because telling the truth often comes at a cost.
The second point is about people and efficiency.
The most painful line in Teng Yaxin's letter
wasn't actually cursing anyone,
but that question:
We're this busy, this tired —
are we actually creating value,
or just performing effort?
This question isn't only for DingTalk.
It's for every single person today,
in their cubicle, at their desk,
still working overtime late at night.
So at the end of the show, I want to leave this question with you.
Think back on your recent work and life.
The things you do,
the things that keep you so busy you can't breathe —
how many of them are truly creating value?
And how many
are just chasing a pace
that is forever receding?
This question has no standard answer.
But it's worth you, for your own sake, thinking it through seriously.
Listen again
Try it without the transcript and notice what sounds clearer.
What vocabulary does this episode teach?
词汇The 75,000-character letter at the heart of the story. 辞职 (resign) + 信 (letter).
HSK 1-4. commerce; commercial.
HSK 1-4. the internet; network.
HSK 1-4. tool.
HSK 1-4. standard.
HSK 1-4. efficiency.
HSK 1-4. core / nucleus.
一封辞职信,掀翻了一家大公司的 CEO = a resignation letter toppled a big company's CEO.
更像是一份完整的复盘报告 = more like a complete retrospective report. Originally a Go/chess term, now common in business.
一种'向上讨好'的文化 = a culture of pleasing superiors. 讨好 = to curry favor.
互相内耗 = wearing each other down internally. 内 (internal) + 耗 (consume).
HSK 6. 很多决策,靠的是领导的个人喜好 = many decisions relied on leaders' personal preferences.
集体倦怠 = collective burnout.
舆论彻底被点燃了 = public opinion was completely set ablaze.
* beyond level超纲词
What grammar patterns appear in this episode?
语法你可以把 X 理解成 Y (you can understand X as Y)
A framing device — gives the listener an analogy for an unfamiliar thing.
你可以把它理解成一个'公司版的微信'。
第一 ... 第二 ... 第三 ... 第四 ... (enumeration)
Ordinal listing — structures a multi-point argument.
第一,团队里弥漫着一种'向上讨好'的文化。
第二,内部恶性竞争严重。
第四,是无意义的加班。
不是 X,而是 Y (not X, but Y)
Strong correction, central to the letter's argument.
第一位的不是用户,而是让领导满意。
其实不是骂谁,而是那个问题。
这等于是 + Clause (this amounts to)
Interpretive marker — restates an action's real meaning.
这等于是阿里最高层,公开否定了钉钉这套管理方式。
Subject + 到底 + 是 ... 还是 ...? (after all, X or Y?)
Sharpened either-or question for rhetorical weight.
自己到底是在创造产品,还是只是在精疲力竭地,追赶一个永远在后退的节奏。
到底是在创造价值,还是只是在表演努力?
仅仅 + Verb,就 + Result (merely X, and Y followed)
Emphasizes a large outcome from a small action.
仅仅是认真地、完整地,写下了他看到的真相。就撬动了一家万亿市值公司的人事变动。
值得 + Subject + Verb (worth doing)
Marks something as worthwhile.
值得我们记住。
但是值得你,为自己,认真想一想。
Proper Nouns
专有名词Free account
Keep learning from this story
Create a free account to keep saved words and your preferred level together.
- Keep words with their story context
- Remember your preferred level
- Build your vocabulary over time