Fluentide

A Chinese podcast · Same story, 4 levels

A FlyDubai Co-Pilot Attacked His Captain With the Cockpit's Own Axe. Passengers Broke In and Saved the Plane. — episode cover art
5:23

迪拜航空副驾驶用驾驶舱里的斧子砍伤机长,乘客冲进去救下了整架飞机

A FlyDubai Co-Pilot Attacked His Captain With the Cockpit's Own Axe. Passengers Broke In and Saved the Plane.

About this story

The FlyDubai FZ1073 axe attack: how a locked post-9/11 cockpit door nearly doomed 174 people, and the pilot-vetting gap it exposed. HSK 5-6 Chinese listening practice.

This is an HSK 5-6 Chinese listening episode that runs about 5 minutes. The full Mandarin script is shown with tap-for-pinyin and a line-by-line English translation, so you can listen and read at once — comprehensible input in the sense of Stephen Krashen's i+1 theory. It teaches 18 key vocabulary words such as 乘客、保护、危险 and walks through 7 grammar patterns, each explained in English with examples. The same news story is retold at 4 difficulty levels — use the level selector above to find the version that is challenging but still understandable for you.

Read at your level

原文

Read the complete story in Chinese. Reveal pinyin and English only when you need them.

这次的凶器,根本不用带上飞机。
安检查了每一个乘客的包,可它早就在飞机上了——就挂在驾驶舱里。
那是一把应急斧。
每架民航客机的驾驶舱里都有一把,用来在起火或者舱门卡死的时候,劈开面板、砸开出口。
说白了,这是一件救命的工具。
九月三十号,迪拜航空 FZ1073 航班上,有人拿它来杀人。
拿斧子的人,是这架飞机的副驾驶;被砍的,是坐在他旁边的机长。
我们把时间倒回那天早上。
当地时间七点零五分,飞机从迪拜起飞,飞往以色列的特拉维夫。
机上一共一百七十四人,大多数是以色列乘客。
机长 Smit 是印度人,飞了十七年。
起飞两个多小时,一切正常,飞机在一万多米的高度巡航。
然后,副驾驶突然抄起应急斧,砍向机长。
机长身中多处伤,倒在驾驶舱地板上。
几乎同时,飞机开始急速下坠。
两分钟之内,掉了五千多米。
下坠得太猛,连尾翼都被扯掉了一部分。
客舱里的乘客后来回忆,那种往下掉、还越来越快的感觉,一听就知道不对。
可是他们帮不上忙,因为驾驶舱的门是锁着的。
这扇门,本身就是一个故事。
二零零一年九一一之后,全世界的航空公司都换上了加固的驾驶舱门:防弹、从外面打不开,只能里面的人开锁。
设计的前提是:危险来自客舱,飞行员在门里面是安全的。
可如果危险本来就坐在驾驶舱里呢?
那这扇门保护的,就成了凶手。
这不是第一次。
二零一五年,德国之翼的一名副驾驶,趁机长去洗手间,把他锁在门外,故意让飞机撞山,一百五十人全部遇难。
同样一扇门,那一次,机长在外面怎么也进不去。
这一次,结局之所以不一样,关键在于门的另一边,躺着一个还没放弃的人。
机长事后对印度总理莫迪说:我告诉自己,再拼最后一下,去把门打开。
他伤得那么重,还是把门打开了。
门一开,乘客冲了进去。
冲在最前面的是一个以色列水管工,他说:我抓住那个恐怖分子,从后面锁住他,先把他拖出了驾驶舱。
其他几个乘客跟上,把副驾驶死死按在地上。
接下来是最要命的问题:没有人在开飞机。
巧的是,机上正好有两名不当班的飞行员,以乘客身份坐在后面。
他们进了驾驶舱,接管了飞机。
从开始下坠到重新稳住,大约十二分钟,飞机最后在四千五百米左右改平。
另一边,一位从中国回来的牙医跪在机长身边,一直按着伤口帮他止血。
飞机放弃了特拉维夫,备降沙特西北部的塔布克,又飞了八十五分钟,安全落地。
乘客无人重伤,机长伤势严重,但已经稳定。
十二分钟的混乱,一百七十四条命,靠的是一个受伤的机长、一群普通乘客、两个碰巧在场的飞行员,再加一个牙医。
那么,问题出在哪儿?
副驾驶名叫 Hamam al-Hammami,阿曼国籍。
他之前在阿曼航空工作,公司发现他有极端倾向,据说浏览过激进网站,于是停了他的飞行资格,调去做文职。
二零二四年前后,他辞职,跳槽到了迪拜航空。
迪拜航空当然做了背景调查,但查的主要是犯罪记录。
他没有犯罪记录,所以顺利过关。
至于他是不是正在激进化,这套审查根本没有去看,阿曼方面也没有被问到。
说得直白一点:前东家已经不敢让他开飞机,新东家却让他坐回了驾驶舱。
这就是漏洞。
阿联酋检察官已经把这件事定性为恐怖袭击,以色列总理内塔尼亚胡也说,他上飞机,就是为了让整架飞机坠毁。
现在,阿联酋、以色列、沙特等四个国家的安全部门在联合调查:他是单独行动,还是背后有组织?
这件事最让人不安的地方在于:九一一过去二十五年,航空安全的思路一直是防乘客。
安检越来越严,门越来越结实,可这些都假设坏人在门外。
一旦坏人就是飞行员本人,这一整套系统几乎是失效的。
所以接下来,行业很可能要面对一个尴尬的问题:飞行员的背景,该查到多深?
是只看有没有犯罪记录,还是要看他的网络言论、他的想法?
查得太浅,会有漏洞;查得太深,又会碰到隐私的问题。
你觉得,一家航空公司有没有权利,去查一个飞行员在网上看了什么?
English transcript reference

This time, the weapon didn't need to be smuggled on board at all.

Security checked every passenger's bag, but it was already on the plane — hanging in the cockpit.

It was an emergency crash axe.

Every airliner cockpit carries one, for chopping through panels and smashing open exits in a fire or when a door jams.

Put simply, it's a tool for saving lives.

On September 30th, on FlyDubai flight FZ1073, someone used it to try to kill.

The man holding the axe was the plane's co-pilot; the man he hacked at was the captain sitting next to him.

Let's rewind to that morning.

At 7:05 a.m. local time, the plane took off from Dubai for Tel Aviv, Israel.

There were 174 people on board, most of them Israeli passengers.

The captain, Smit, is Indian, with seventeen years of flying.

Just over two hours after takeoff, everything was normal, cruising above ten thousand meters.

Then the co-pilot suddenly grabbed the crash axe and swung at the captain.

The captain, wounded in several places, collapsed onto the cockpit floor.

Almost at the same moment, the plane began a rapid plunge.

Within two minutes, it fell more than five thousand meters.

The dive was so violent that part of the tail fin was torn away.

Passengers in the cabin later recalled that the feeling of falling, faster and faster, told them instantly something was wrong.

But they couldn't help, because the cockpit door was locked.

That door is a story in itself.

After 9/11 in 2001, airlines worldwide installed reinforced cockpit doors: bulletproof, impossible to open from outside, unlocked only from within.

The design assumes the danger comes from the cabin, and the pilots are safe behind the door.

But what if the danger is already sitting in the cockpit?

Then the door ends up protecting the attacker.

It has happened before.

In 2015, a Germanwings co-pilot waited until the captain went to the toilet, locked him out, and deliberately flew the plane into a mountain, killing all 150 people.

The same kind of door — that time, the captain outside simply couldn't get in.

This time the ending was different, and the key was that on the other side of the door lay a man who hadn't given up.

The captain later told Indian Prime Minister Modi: I told myself, one last push, go open that door.

Badly hurt as he was, he still got the door open.

The moment it opened, passengers rushed in.

First in was an Israeli plumber, who said: I grabbed the terrorist, locked him from behind, and first dragged him out of the cockpit.

Several other passengers followed and pinned the co-pilot hard to the floor.

Next came the most critical problem: nobody was flying the plane.

As luck would have it, two off-duty pilots were on board, sitting in the back as passengers.

They went into the cockpit and took over.

From the start of the plunge to stabilizing took about twelve minutes; the plane finally leveled off at around 4,500 meters.

Meanwhile, a dentist on his way back from China knelt by the captain, pressing on the wounds to stop the bleeding.

The plane gave up on Tel Aviv and diverted to Tabuk in northwest Saudi Arabia, landing safely eighty-five minutes later.

No passengers were seriously hurt; the captain's injuries are serious but he is stable.

Twelve minutes of chaos, 174 lives, saved by a wounded captain, a group of ordinary passengers, two pilots who happened to be there, and a dentist.

So where did things go wrong?

The co-pilot is Hamam al-Hammami, an Omani national.

He used to work at Oman Air; the airline found he had extremist leanings — reportedly he had visited radical websites — so it suspended his flying and moved him to a desk job.

Around 2024, he quit and moved to FlyDubai.

FlyDubai did run a background check, of course, but it mainly looked at criminal records.

He had none, so he passed.

Whether he was becoming radicalized, the screening never looked at — and Oman was never asked.

To put it bluntly: his old employer no longer dared let him fly, and his new one put him back in the cockpit.

That's the loophole.

The UAE attorney general has classified it as a terrorist attack, and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu said the man boarded intending to crash the whole plane.

Now security agencies from four countries, including the UAE, Israel and Saudi Arabia, are jointly investigating: did he act alone, or was there a group behind him?

The most unsettling part is this: twenty-five years after 9/11, aviation security has been built around guarding against passengers.

Screening has grown stricter, doors stronger, but all of it assumes the bad guy is outside the door.

Once the bad guy is the pilot himself, the whole system nearly stops working.

So the industry will likely face an awkward question: how deep should pilot background checks go?

Only criminal records, or also what they say online, what they think?

Too shallow and there are loopholes; too deep and you run into privacy.

What do you think — should an airline have the right to check what a pilot looks at online?

Listen again

Try it without the transcript and notice what sounds clearer.

What vocabulary does this episode teach?

词汇
chéngkèpassenger

HSK 4. 大多数是以色列乘客.

bǎohùto protect

HSK 4. 这扇门保护的,就成了凶手.

wēixiǎndanger; dangerous

HSK 4. 危险来自客舱 = danger comes from the cabin.

gùyìdeliberately

HSK 4. 故意让飞机撞山.

diàocháto investigate; investigation

HSK 4. 背景调查 = background check; 联合调查 = joint investigation.

fàngqìto give up

HSK 4. 一个还没放弃的人; 飞机放弃了特拉维夫.

ānquánsafe; safety

HSK 4. 安全落地 = land safely; 航空安全 = aviation safety.

xìtǒngsystem

HSK 5. 这一整套系统几乎是失效的.

jìlùrecord

HSK 5. 犯罪记录 = criminal record.

xiōngqìmurder weapon

凶 = violent/murderous, 器 = implement. The opening word of the episode.

jiàshǐcāngcockpit

驾驶 (to pilot) + 舱 (cabin). Contrast 客舱, the passenger cabin.

fùjiàshǐco-pilot; first officer

副 = deputy. The second pilot beside the 机长.

xiàzhuìto plunge; to fall

急速下坠 = a rapid plunge.

bèijiàngto divert and land at an alternate airport

备降塔布克 = diverted to Tabuk.

jíduānextreme; extremist

极端倾向 = extremist leanings.

jījìnhuàradicalization

激进 = radical, -化 = -ization.

lòudòngloophole; gap

Literally a leaking hole. 这就是漏洞.

kǒngbù xíjīterrorist attack

恐怖 = terror, 袭击 = attack. 定性为恐怖袭击 = classified as a terrorist attack.

* beyond level超纲词

What grammar patterns appear in this episode?

语法

之所以 A,关键在于 B / 是因为 B

Explains the reason behind an outcome: the reason A happened lies in B.

这一次,结局之所以不一样,关键在于门的另一边,躺着一个还没放弃的人。

连 X 都 …

Even X — stresses an extreme case.

下坠得太猛,连尾翼都被扯掉了一部分。

至于 X,…

As for X — shifts to a related point.

至于他是不是正在激进化,这套审查根本没有去看。

一旦 A,B

Once A happens, B follows.

一旦坏人就是飞行员本人,这一整套系统几乎是失效的。

把 X 定性为 Y

Formally classify X as Y.

阿联酋检察官已经把这件事定性为恐怖袭击。

A 太 X,会…;A 太 Y,又会…

Weighs two opposite risks.

查得太浅,会有漏洞;查得太深,又会碰到隐私的问题。

说白了 / 说得直白一点

Conversational markers meaning 'put simply' / 'to put it bluntly'.

说白了,这是一件救命的工具。

说得直白一点:前东家已经不敢让他开飞机,新东家却让他坐回了驾驶舱。

Proper nouns

专有名词
迪拜航空Díbài HángkōngFlyDubai迪拜DíbàiDubai以色列YǐsèlièIsrael特拉维夫TèlāwéifūTel Aviv德国之翼Déguó zhī YìGermanwings莫迪MòdíNarendra Modi沙特ShātèSaudi Arabia塔布克TǎbùkèTabuk阿曼ĀmànOman阿曼航空Āmàn HángkōngOman Air阿联酋ĀliánqiúUnited Arab Emirates内塔尼亚胡NèitǎníyàhúBenjamin Netanyahu

Free account

Keep learning from this story

Create a free account to keep saved words and your preferred level together.

  • Keep words with their story context
  • Remember your preferred level
  • Build your vocabulary over time

Keep learning