A Chinese podcast · Same story, 4 levels

Jason Kelce 让球迷把尿寄给 AI 数据中心。他真正想说的,是水。
Jason Kelce Is Asking Fans to Send Their Pee to AI Data Centers. What He Actually Wants to Talk About Is Water.
About this story
Jason Kelce Is Asking Fans to Send Their Pee to AI Data Centers. What He Actually Wants to Talk About Is Water. HSK 5-6 Chinese listening practice.
This is an HSK 5-6 Chinese listening episode that runs about 5 minutes. The full Mandarin script is shown with tap-for-pinyin and a line-by-line English translation, so you can listen and read at once — comprehensible input in the sense of Stephen Krashen's i+1 theory. It teaches 9 key vocabulary words such as 比例、逻辑、抽象 and walks through 3 grammar patterns, each explained in English with examples. The same news story is retold at 4 difficulty levels — use the level selector above to find the version that is challenging but still understandable for you.
Read at your level
原文Read the complete story in Chinese. Reveal pinyin and English only when you need them.
English transcript reference
Start with something you are holding right now.
Play a game on your phone for long enough and the back of it gets warm.
Current flows into a chip; part of it becomes the computed result, and all of the rest becomes heat.
There is no dodging this: if it is computing, it is producing heat.
Now scale that up proportionally.
Artificial intelligence does not run on one chip. It runs on a whole building of chips, twenty-four hours a day, without stopping.
A building like that has a formal name: a data centre.
Its hardest problem is not, in fact, insufficient power.
It is that the heat cannot get out.
As the temperature rises a chip throttles itself; rise further and it simply burns.
So what a data centre truly does every day comes down to one thing: moving heat.
The cheapest and most widespread way to move heat is with water.
The process runs roughly like this: water is sent past the hot parts, comes back heated, and goes out to a cooling tower outside the building.
In the tower, some of that water evaporates.
Evaporating water carries off a great deal of heat; the water that has not evaporated drops in temperature and flows back inside.
The whole logic turns on those two words: "evaporates away".
That portion of the water did not get dirty, and did not go down a drain; it turned straight into vapour, dispersed into the air, and was gone.
Which is why, in this industry, nobody says "uses water" about a data centre. They say "consumes water".
Water that is used returns to the system. Water that is consumed does not.
How much water does a large data centre consume in a year?
In publicly disclosed figures, hundreds of millions of gallons is a fairly common order of magnitude.
More troubling than the total are the following two things.
First, to keep the pipework from scaling and growing bacteria, many cooling towers use treated clean water — which is to say, standard drinking water.
Second, these buildings tend to be sited where electricity and land are cheap, and such places tend also to be dry.
Put those two together and you get the argument that has replayed in so many small American towns these past few years:
A building moves in, brings a few dozen jobs and a line of tax revenue, and starts drinking the town’s water.
The people of the town have to vote between those two things.
The principle is not complicated; most people have heard it once, and then forgotten it.
This August, one man made it unforgettable.
His name is Jason Kelce, a retired football player, famous in America at the household-name level.
He and two companies made an advert: one is his own beer brand, the other makes canned water.
In it, he holds up a glass jar and, with an utterly straight face, sings:
Give us your pee.
Let us all pee on the computers.
They then genuinely listed the jar for sale at eighteen dollars.
Taken apart, it is a glass jar with a lid, with a line printed on the side: data centre coolant collector.
A disclaimer runs at the end of the advert: none of the above is to be taken literally.
The joke works because of a fact from a secondary-school biology lesson: urine is ninety-five percent water.
So the entire advert accomplishes exactly one thing.
It turns the abstract sentence "data centres drink water" into an image you cannot look away from.
This is worth spelling out, because it is a rare success in communication.
The same problem, argued in gallon figures for ten years, left the public retaining close to nothing.
One man holding a jar and singing went nationwide in a day.
The difference is not in the quantity of information, but in whether there is an action a body can perform.
There is another side to this, though, and it belongs in the same breath.
The advert was made by a beer brand and a water brand.
The problem they point at is real, and they are also running a business.
An advert against wasting water ends up selling an empty glass jar for eighteen dollars.
Those two facts do not contradict each other — it is only worth knowing what you are watching while you are being made to laugh.
Finally, back to that warm chip at the start.
The little bit of heat in your phone you can feel with your hand.
The heat of a whole building you cannot feel; it has been moved into water, and the water into vapour, and dispersed into the air.
It never disappeared. It just moved somewhere you cannot see.
Think about it:
If a data centre were built beside your house tomorrow, bringing jobs and tax revenue and drinking your town’s water, which side would you vote for?
Listen again
Try it without the transcript and notice what sounds clearer.
What vocabulary does this episode teach?
词汇按比例放大 = to scale up proportionally.
The whole 逻辑 of cooling turns on evaporation.
The advert turns an 抽象 sentence into a picture.
Publicly 披露 figures put consumption in the hundreds of millions of gallons.
Two things can 同时成立 — both be true at the same time.
Not an exact figure but the scale of it.
Water fit to drink — which is often exactly what cooling towers consume.
What a town gains, set against the water it loses.
Literally "known in every house". Describes his level of fame.
* beyond level超纲词
What grammar patterns appear in this episode?
语法与其说……不如说……的替代:不在……,在……
Locates the real difference: not in X, but in Y.
差别不在信息量,而在于,有没有一个身体能做的动作。 — The difference is not in the quantity of information but in whether there is an action a body can perform.
并不……,可以同时成立
States that two apparently opposed things are compatible.
这两件事并不冲突,可以同时成立。 — These two do not contradict each other; both can hold at once.
只是换了一个……的地方
Not gone, merely relocated — a closing move that reframes.
它从来没有消失,只是换了一个,你看不见的地方。 — It never disappeared; it just moved somewhere you cannot see.
Proper Nouns
专有名词Sources
来源Free account
Keep learning from this story
Create a free account to keep saved words and your preferred level together.
- Keep words with their story context
- Remember your preferred level
- Build your vocabulary over time