Fluentide

A Chinese podcast · Same story, 4 levels

Jason Kelce's Pee Ad Spotlights AI Water Use — episode cover art

Photo: Jim Young · CC BY 4.0

4:43

Jason Kelce 让球迷把尿寄给 AI 数据中心。他真正想说的,是水。

Jason Kelce's Pee Ad Spotlights AI Water Use

About this story

Jason Kelce's Pee Ad Spotlights AI Water Use. HSK 5-6 Chinese listening practice.

This is an HSK 5-6 Chinese listening episode that runs about 5 minutes. The full Mandarin script is shown with tap-for-pinyin and a line-by-line English translation, so you can listen and read at once — comprehensible input in the sense of Stephen Krashen's i+1 theory. It teaches 10 key vocabulary words such as 水、热、楼 and walks through 3 grammar patterns, each explained in English with examples. The same news story is retold at 4 difficulty levels — use the level selector above to find the version that is challenging but still understandable for you.

Read at your level

原文

Read the complete story in Chinese. Reveal pinyin and English only when you need them.

先从一个你手里就有的东西说起。
手机打久了游戏,背面会发烫。
电流进一块芯片,一部分,变成算出来的结果,剩下的,全部变成热。
这一点躲不开:只要在算,就一定在发热。
现在,把这件事按比例放大。
人工智能跑的不是一块芯片,是一整栋楼的芯片,一天二十四小时,不停。
这样一栋楼,有个正式名字,叫数据中心。
它最难的问题,其实不是电不够。
是热出不去。
温度一上来,芯片会自动降速;再上来,就直接烧了。
所以数据中心真正每天在做的事,只有一件,就是搬热。
搬热最便宜、也最普遍的办法,是用水。
过程大致是这样:让水从发热的地方流过去,水被烧热,再送到楼外的,冷却塔。
在塔里,一部分水会蒸发掉。
水蒸发时,会带走大量的热,剩下没蒸发的那部分水,温度降下来,再流回楼里。
整套逻辑的关键,就在“蒸发掉”,这三个字上。
那部分水没有变脏,也没有流进下水道,它直接变成水汽,散进空气里,走了。
这就是为什么谈数据中心时,行业里不说“用水”,说“消耗水”。
用掉的水会回到系统,消耗掉的不会。
一个大型数据中心,一年消耗多少水?
公开披露的数字里,几亿加仑,是相当常见的量级。
比总量更麻烦的,是下面这两件事。
第一,为了不让管路结垢、长细菌,很多冷却塔用的是处理过的干净水——也就是标准的饮用水。
第二,这类楼常常选在电价低、地价低的地方,而那种地方,往往同时偏干旱。
两条叠在一起,就有了这几年美国许多小镇上反复上演的那场争论:
一栋楼开进来,带来几十个岗位和一笔税收,同时开始喝这个镇的水。
镇上的人,要在这两样之间投票。
这个道理其实不复杂,很多人都听过一遍,然后,转头就忘了。
今年八月,有一个人让它忘不掉。
他叫杰森·凯尔斯,退役的橄榄球运动员,在美国属于家喻户晓的那一档知名度。
他和两家公司一起拍了一支广告:一家是他自己的啤酒品牌,另一家是做罐装水的。
广告里,他举着一个玻璃罐子,表情极其严肃地唱:
把你们的尿给我们。
我们一起,尿在电脑上。
他还真的把罐子上架开卖了,十八美元,一个。
拆开看,那就是一个带盖的玻璃罐,罐身上印着一行字:数据中心冷却液收集罐。
广告结尾压了一行免责声明:以上内容,请勿当真。
这个玩笑之所以能成立,是因为一个中学生物课上的事实:尿里,百分之九十五是水。
所以整支广告,其实只完成了一件事。
它把“数据中心在喝水”这句抽象的话,变成了一个你没办法不看的画面。
这件事值得说清楚,因为它是传播里少见的成功案例。
同样一个问题,用加仑数讲了十年,公众记住的,接近于零。
一个人举着罐子唱歌,一天之内,传遍全国。
差别不在信息量,而在于,有没有一个身体能做的动作。
不过,这件事还有另一面,也该一起说。
拍这支广告的,是一个卖啤酒的品牌和一个卖水的品牌。
他们指出的是真问题,同时,他们也在做生意。
一支反对浪费水的广告,最终卖出去的是一个十八美元的空玻璃罐。
这两件事并不冲突,可以同时成立,只是你在被逗笑的时候,最好知道自己在看什么。
最后回到最开始那块发烫的芯片。
你手机上的那点热,用手,就能感觉到。
一栋楼的热,你感觉不到;它被搬进了水里,水又变成水汽,散在空中。
它从来没有消失,只是换了一个,你看不见的地方。
你想一想:
如果明天你家旁边要盖一座数据中心,它带来岗位和税收,也开始喝你镇上的水,你投哪一边?
English transcript reference

Start with something you are holding right now.

Play a game on your phone for long enough and the back of it gets warm.

Current flows into a chip; part of it becomes the computed result, and all of the rest becomes heat.

There is no dodging this: if it is computing, it is producing heat.

Now scale that up proportionally.

Artificial intelligence does not run on one chip. It runs on a whole building of chips, twenty-four hours a day, without stopping.

A building like that has a formal name: a data centre.

Its hardest problem is not, in fact, insufficient power.

It is that the heat cannot get out.

As the temperature rises a chip throttles itself; rise further and it simply burns.

So what a data centre truly does every day comes down to one thing: moving heat.

The cheapest and most widespread way to move heat is with water.

The process runs roughly like this: water is sent past the hot parts, comes back heated, and goes out to a cooling tower outside the building.

In the tower, some of that water evaporates.

Evaporating water carries off a great deal of heat; the water that has not evaporated drops in temperature and flows back inside.

The whole logic turns on those two words: "evaporates away".

That portion of the water did not get dirty, and did not go down a drain; it turned straight into vapour, dispersed into the air, and was gone.

Which is why, in this industry, nobody says "uses water" about a data centre. They say "consumes water".

Water that is used returns to the system. Water that is consumed does not.

How much water does a large data centre consume in a year?

In publicly disclosed figures, hundreds of millions of gallons is a fairly common order of magnitude.

More troubling than the total are the following two things.

First, to keep the pipework from scaling and growing bacteria, many cooling towers use treated clean water — which is to say, standard drinking water.

Second, these buildings tend to be sited where electricity and land are cheap, and such places tend also to be dry.

Put those two together and you get the argument that has replayed in so many small American towns these past few years:

A building moves in, brings a few dozen jobs and a line of tax revenue, and starts drinking the town’s water.

The people of the town have to vote between those two things.

The principle is not complicated; most people have heard it once, and then forgotten it.

This August, one man made it unforgettable.

His name is Jason Kelce, a retired football player, famous in America at the household-name level.

He and two companies made an advert: one is his own beer brand, the other makes canned water.

In it, he holds up a glass jar and, with an utterly straight face, sings:

Give us your pee.

Let us all pee on the computers.

They then genuinely listed the jar for sale at eighteen dollars.

Taken apart, it is a glass jar with a lid, with a line printed on the side: data centre coolant collector.

A disclaimer runs at the end of the advert: none of the above is to be taken literally.

The joke works because of a fact from a secondary-school biology lesson: urine is ninety-five percent water.

So the entire advert accomplishes exactly one thing.

It turns the abstract sentence "data centres drink water" into an image you cannot look away from.

This is worth spelling out, because it is a rare success in communication.

The same problem, argued in gallon figures for ten years, left the public retaining close to nothing.

One man holding a jar and singing went nationwide in a day.

The difference is not in the quantity of information, but in whether there is an action a body can perform.

There is another side to this, though, and it belongs in the same breath.

The advert was made by a beer brand and a water brand.

The problem they point at is real, and they are also running a business.

An advert against wasting water ends up selling an empty glass jar for eighteen dollars.

Those two facts do not contradict each other — it is only worth knowing what you are watching while you are being made to laugh.

Finally, back to that warm chip at the start.

The little bit of heat in your phone you can feel with your hand.

The heat of a whole building you cannot feel; it has been moved into water, and the water into vapour, and dispersed into the air.

It never disappeared. It just moved somewhere you cannot see.

Think about it:

If a data centre were built beside your house tomorrow, bringing jobs and tax revenue and drinking your town’s water, which side would you vote for?

Listen again

Try it without the transcript and notice what sounds clearer.

What vocabulary does this episode teach?

词汇
shuǐwater

Used vs consumed: 用掉的水会回来,消耗掉的不会。

rèheat

If it is computing, it is producing 热.

lóua building

One phone you can feel; one 楼 you cannot.

shùjùdata

数据中心 — data centre.

pǐnpáia brand

A beer 品牌 and a water 品牌 made the advert.

bǐlìproportion, scale

按比例放大 = to scale up proportionally.

luójílogic

The whole 逻辑 of cooling turns on evaporation.

chōuxiàngabstract

The advert turns an 抽象 sentence into a picture.

pīlùto disclose

Publicly 披露 figures put consumption in the hundreds of millions of gallons.

chénglìto hold, to stand up (of an argument)

Two things can 同时成立 — both be true at the same time.

* beyond level超纲词

What grammar patterns appear in this episode?

语法

与其说……不如说……的替代:不在……,在……

Locates the real difference: not in X, but in Y.

差别不在信息量,而在于,有没有一个身体能做的动作。 — The difference is not in the quantity of information but in whether there is an action a body can perform.

并不……,可以同时成立

States that two apparently opposed things are compatible.

这两件事并不冲突,可以同时成立。 — These two do not contradict each other; both can hold at once.

只是换了一个……的地方

Not gone, merely relocated — a closing move that reframes.

它从来没有消失,只是换了一个,你看不见的地方。 — It never disappeared; it just moved somewhere you cannot see.

Proper nouns

专有名词
杰森·凯尔斯Jiésēn Kǎi'ěrsīJason Kelce, retired NFL centre for the Philadelphia Eagles美国Měiguóthe United States

Sources

来源

Free account

Keep learning from this story

Create a free account to keep saved words and your preferred level together.

  • Keep words with their story context
  • Remember your preferred level
  • Build your vocabulary over time

Keep learning