Fluentide

A Chinese podcast · Same story, 4 levels

Christian Bale Spent Twenty Years Building Twelve Houses So Foster Brothers and Sisters Would Stop Being Split Up — episode cover art
4:06

克里斯蒂安·贝尔用了二十年,盖出十二栋房子,只为让寄养的兄弟姐妹不再被分开

Christian Bale Spent Twenty Years Building Twelve Houses So Foster Brothers and Sisters Would Stop Being Split Up

About this story

In the American foster system, a sibling group is harder to place than a single child, so the requirement that brothers and sisters stay together is usually the first thing dropped. Christian Bale spent close to twenty years on that one problem. Together California opened in Palmdale in September 2026: twelve furnished homes on roughly a thousand square metres, the first of its kind in the state, funded by nearly $9 million in donations. The first children move in in October. Chinese listening practice at four levels. HSK 5-6 Chinese listening practice.

This is an HSK 5-6 Chinese listening episode that runs about 4 minutes. The full Mandarin script is shown with tap-for-pinyin and a line-by-line English translation, so you can listen and read at once — comprehensible input in the sense of Stephen Krashen's i+1 theory. It teaches 12 key vocabulary words such as 系统、关系、价值 and walks through 3 grammar patterns, each explained in English with examples. The same news story is retold at 4 difficulty levels — use the level selector above to find the version that is challenging but still understandable for you.

Read at your level

原文

Read the complete story in Chinese. Reveal pinyin and English only when you need them.

先把问题摆清楚,因为它比大多数人想象的要具体。
在美国,当一个孩子因为家庭原因无法继续留在原生家庭时,他会被送进寄养系统。
寄养家庭提供的是一套基础配置:一张床、一日三餐、一个能让他继续上学的住址。
从行政角度看,这套系统要回答的核心问题只有一个:这个孩子今晚睡在哪里。
矛盾出现在需要一次安置一组兄弟姐妹的时候。
把一个孩子放进一个愿意接收的家庭,和把三个孩子一起放进同一个家庭,是两件难度完全不同的事。
后者要求这个家庭同时有足够的房间、足够的精力和足够的经济承受力。
于是在实际操作中,最容易被牺牲的那个变量,就是"他们必须待在一起"。
结果是,在美国的寄养系统里,兄弟姐妹能够留在同一个家的情况相当少见。
哥哥去了一户人家,妹妹去了城市另一端的另一户。
这里有一个很容易被跳过去的细节,但它其实是整件事的要害。
这些孩子刚刚失去的是他们的家。
而系统在安置他们的过程中,又顺手拿走了他们手里仅剩的那段关系。
一个已经失去一切的孩子,连唯一还认识的那个人也被分走了。
有一个人把这件事惦记了将近二十年。
他叫克里斯蒂安·贝尔,一位拿过奥斯卡的电影演员。
大约二十年前,他开始关注寄养系统中兄弟姐妹被拆散的问题。
到这一步为止,这还是一个常见的故事:名人关注某个议题。
不常见的是他接下来的做法。
他没有停在捐一笔款、拍一组照片、出席一场慈善晚宴的位置上。
他和妻子,以及一位在加州大学任职的医生朋友,共同成立了一个专门的机构。
目标写得非常具体:建一个地方,让进入寄养系统的兄弟姐妹可以住在同一个屋檐下。
目标越具体,执行就越慢。
拿地、审批、筹款、说服县里和社区,这些环节没有一个能靠名气跳过去。
真正破土动工是在两年前。
今年九月,整片社区建成开放。
地点在加州帕姆代尔,占地约一千平方米,共十二栋房子。
每一栋都配齐了家具,孩子搬进去当天就能生活。
这是加州第一个以这种形式运作的寄养社区。
第一批孩子将在十月份入住。
整个项目通过捐款筹集了将近九百万美元,资金来自大量个人和机构。
在开放当天,贝尔说了一段话。
他说,这些孩子心里装的是伤心和痛苦,而把这些变成爱、希望以及对未来的期待,是他们这些成年人的职责。
把时间轴拉开,这件事的分量才真正显出来。
二十年里,任何一个环节卡住,他都可以非常体面地退出。
土地拿不到、钱筹不齐、政策变了、他自己忙于拍片,每一条都是充分且不会被指责的理由。
一个演员在公共议题上做到捐款与发声这一步,舆论通常就已经给出掌声了。
他把剩下的路走完了。
需要说清楚的是,十二栋房子在全美寄养系统的体量面前微不足道,它救不了这个系统。
它的价值在别处。
它把"兄弟姐妹必须分开"从一条默认规则,变成了一个可以被推翻的假设。
一旦有一个地方证明这件事做得到,其他地方就再也不能说这件事做不到。
如果你眼下有一件必须投入二十年、而且中途随时可以体面退出的事,你今天会动手吗?
English transcript reference

Let us set the problem out clearly, because it is more concrete than most people assume.

In America, when a child cannot remain in their family of origin for family reasons, they enter the foster system.

A foster family supplies a basic configuration: a bed, three meals a day, an address from which they can continue going to school.

Administratively, this system has only one core question to answer — where does this child sleep tonight.

The contradiction appears when a whole sibling group has to be placed at once.

Putting one child into a family willing to take them, and putting three children into the same family, are two problems of entirely different difficulty.

The second requires that family to have enough rooms, enough energy and enough financial capacity all at the same time.

So in practice, the variable that gets sacrificed first is the requirement that they stay together.

The result is that in the American foster system, siblings ending up in the same home is fairly rare.

The older brother goes to one household, the younger sister to another at the far end of the city.

There is a detail here that is very easy to skip past, and it is actually the heart of the matter.

What these children have just lost is their home.

And in the process of placing them, the system also takes away the one relationship they had left in their hands.

A child who has already lost everything has the only person they still recognise taken away as well.

One man kept this in mind for nearly twenty years.

His name is Christian Bale, an Oscar-winning film actor.

Around twenty years ago he began paying attention to the problem of siblings being split up in the foster system.

Up to that point, this is still a familiar story: a famous person takes an interest in an issue.

What is not familiar is what he did next.

He did not stop at writing a cheque, taking a set of photographs and attending a charity dinner.

He, his wife, and a doctor friend who holds a post at the University of California jointly founded a dedicated organisation.

The goal was written very concretely: build a place where siblings entering the foster system can live under the same roof.

The more concrete the goal, the slower the execution.

Acquiring land, approvals, fundraising, persuading the county and the community — not one of those steps can be skipped on the strength of fame.

Ground was actually broken two years ago.

This September, the whole community was completed and opened.

It is in Palmdale, California, covering around a thousand square metres, with twelve houses.

Each one is fully furnished, so a child can start living there the day they move in.

It is the first foster community in California operating in this form.

The first children will move in during October.

The project raised close to nine million dollars through donations, from a large number of individuals and institutions.

On opening day, Bale said a few words.

He said these children carry grief and pain inside them, and that turning that into love, into hope, into an expectation of the future, is the responsibility of the adults.

Pull the timeline open and the weight of this finally shows.

Across twenty years, at any point where something jammed, he could have withdrawn entirely gracefully.

Land falling through, funding coming up short, policy changing, his own shooting schedule — every one of those is a sufficient reason that nobody would have criticised.

When an actor gets as far as donating and speaking out on a public issue, public opinion usually applauds already.

He finished the rest of the road.

It should be said plainly that twelve houses is negligible against the scale of the American foster system; it cannot save that system.

Its value lies elsewhere.

It turns "siblings have to be separated" from a default rule into an assumption that can be overturned.

Once one place has proved this can be done, nowhere else can go on saying it cannot.

If you had something in front of you right now that demanded twenty years, and that you could gracefully quit at any point along the way, would you start today?

Listen again

Try it without the transcript and notice what sounds clearer.

What vocabulary does this episode teach?

词汇
xìtǒngsystem

HSK 4. 他会被送进寄养系统 — the episode treats the system as an actor with its own incentives.

guānxirelationship

HSK 3. 拿走了他们手里仅剩的那段关系 — note 段, the measure word for a relationship.

jiàzhívalue

HSK 4. 它的价值在别处 — the episode refuses to claim that twelve houses fixed anything.

mùbiāogoal

HSK 4. 目标越具体,执行就越慢 — the sentence that explains the twenty years.

jùtǐconcrete, specific

HSK 3. Paired with 目标 above, and the reason this project was slow rather than symbolic.

qīngchuclear

HSK 2. 需要说清楚的是,十二栋房子在全美寄养系统的体量面前微不足道。

yuánshēng jiātíngfamily of origin

无法继续留在原生家庭 — the precise term, now common in Chinese discussion of childhood.

chéngshòulìcapacity to bear

足够的经济承受力 — one of the three things a family needs to take three children instead of one.

xīshēngto sacrifice

最容易被牺牲的那个变量 — the verb that names what the system gives up first.

biànliàngvariable

Deliberately cold vocabulary for a warm subject, which is the point being made.

pòtǔ dònggōngto break ground

真正破土动工是在两年前 — eighteen years of everything else came first.

tuīfānto overturn

变成了一个可以被推翻的假设 — the whole value of twelve houses, stated in one verb.

* beyond level超纲词

What grammar patterns appear in this episode?

语法

越 A,就越 B

The more A, the more B. Two 越 clauses lock the two variables together, here to explain why a concrete goal is slower than a vague one.

目标越具体,执行就越慢。

没有停在……的位置上

Did not stop at a certain point. Naming the position someone could have stopped at is what turns continuing into a decision.

他没有停在捐一笔款、拍一组照片、出席一场慈善晚宴的位置上。

一旦……,就再也不能……

Once X happens, it is no longer possible to Y. Marks an irreversible change in what can be argued, not merely in what exists.

一旦有一个地方证明这件事做得到,其他地方就再也不能说这件事做不到。

Proper nouns

专有名词
美国Měiguóthe United States克里斯蒂安·贝尔Kèlǐsīdì'ān Bèi'ěrChristian Bale加州JiāzhōuCalifornia帕姆代尔Pàmǔdài'ěrPalmdale加州大学Jiāzhōu Dàxuéthe University of California

Free account

Keep learning from this story

Create a free account to keep saved words and your preferred level together.

  • Keep words with their story context
  • Remember your preferred level
  • Build your vocabulary over time

Keep learning