Fluentide

A Chinese podcast · Same story, 4 levels

The Economist's Joke Memo: A Company Tries to Fix Its Staff's Sleep, and Everything Goes Wrong — episode cover art
5:12

《经济学人》的玩笑邮件:一家公司想让员工睡好觉,结果全乱套了

The Economist's Joke Memo: A Company Tries to Fix Its Staff's Sleep, and Everything Goes Wrong

About this story

The Economist's Bartleby column wrote a satirical company memo about a sleep program gone wrong: staff woken at 2 a.m. for "pre-industrial" segmented sleep, bosses' 3 a.m. messages that got everyone up earlier, sleep trackers that made people anxious, and a weighted blanket that needed the fire brigade. The episode says plainly that the memo is a joke — then shows the two real things behind it: historian Roger Ekirch's evidence for "first sleep" and "second sleep", and the 2017 finding that tracker scores can make sleep worse. Chinese listening practice at four levels. HSK 5-6 Chinese listening practice.

This is an HSK 5-6 Chinese listening episode that runs about 5 minutes. The full Mandarin script is shown with tap-for-pinyin and a line-by-line English translation, so you can listen and read at once — comprehensible input in the sense of Stephen Krashen's i+1 theory. It teaches 12 key vocabulary words such as 质量、效果、建议 and walks through 3 grammar patterns, each explained in English with examples. The same news story is retold at 4 difficulty levels — use the level selector above to find the version that is challenging but still understandable for you.

Read at your level

原文

Read the complete story in Chinese. Reveal pinyin and English only when you need them.

先说清楚,今天这个故事是一篇讽刺文章,但它讽刺的东西,有不少是真的。
英国《经济学人》有一个叫“巴托比”的职场专栏,专门写办公室生活的各种折磨。
本周的专栏,写成了一封虚构的公司内部邮件,标题叫《像专业人士一样睡觉》。
邮件的口吻,是一位认真又有点太自信的管理者,在向同事汇报一次睡眠项目的结果。
背景是这样的:公司里一位叫斯图的高层,对自己的睡眠习惯非常热情,常常跟人说休息有多重要。
加上其他行业的研究早就证明,睡眠不足会带来很多负面影响。
于是公司在加拿大团队和全球法务部门,推出了一系列试点项目,目标是让每位同事都精神饱满。
第一个项目叫“清醒时刻”,让志愿者尝试工业化以前的睡眠方式。
他们在凌晨两点起床,工作两个小时,再回去睡第二觉。
这个设定并不是凭空编的。
弗吉尼亚理工大学的历史学家罗杰·埃克奇,在日记、法庭记录、医学著作里找到了五百多处记载。
这些记载显示,工业化以前,人们常常先睡“第一觉”,半夜醒来一个小时左右,祈祷、聊天、干点活,再睡“第二觉”。
他认为,随着家庭照明和街道照明越来越普及,这种分段睡眠逐渐消失,到二十世纪二十年代几乎没人再提。
可在专栏里的这家公司,历史并没有那么浪漫。
有些员工适应了新的节奏,另一些人却再也睡不回去,累得脑子都转不动了。
一位销售人员在客户会议进行到一半时,开始了他的第二觉,一个大订单就这样没了。
更出人意料的是连锁反应。
高层开始在凌晨三点发邮件、发工作消息,没参加试验的年轻员工为了及时回复,也开始提早起床。
他们天不亮就开始忙,又带动了更多同事提前上班。
把这种扩散效应算进去,整个公司的睡眠质量不升反降。
本来想让大家多睡一点,结果大家睡得更少了。
第二个项目,是给参与者寄去各种睡眠追踪设备:戒指、手环、手表,什么都有。
五分之一的同事完全没法让设备运转,邮件称这说明大家的科技水平让人担心,公司为此还要另外开一门培训课。
真正的问题出在数据上。
很多人本来觉得自己休息得很好,直到设备告诉他们,昨晚糟透了。
另一些人被告知睡得像个婴儿,实际上却整夜躺着,焦虑自己的睡眠质量。
这一段同样有现实依据。
二零一七年,芝加哥拉什大学医学中心的睡眠研究者,在《临床睡眠医学杂志》上描述了几位病人。
他们太执着于追踪设备上的分数,反而焦虑到失眠,甚至不相信医院睡眠检查给出的正常结果。
研究者给这种情况起了个名字,中文可以理解为“完美睡眠焦虑症”。
回到专栏。
数据还显示,公司不少员工白天在睡觉,整个高层领导团队在最近一次会议上似乎集体打了瞌睡。
邮件的评论只有一句:这当然不可能是真的。
其他小措施的效果有好有坏。
几位戴眼罩的同事半夜醒来,以为自己被绑架了,吓了一大跳。
一位个子小的同事被加重毯子压住,爬不出来,最后是消防队把她解救出来。
镁片试验更惨,由于一个失误,公司让大家服用了远超推荐量的剂量,而镁有通便作用,这项试验只好作废。
薰衣草喷雾和草药茶大家都觉得挺舒服,只是对睡眠没什么明显帮助。
法务部一位同事不小心把薰衣草喷雾喷到了自己脸上,去医院做了检查,相关诉讼仍在进行中。
邮件因此郑重建议:以后任何试点项目,都不要再拿律师当小白鼠。
同事们自发分享的助眠建议倒很实用,比如听世界银行出版物的有声版、运动员的赛后采访,以及所有投资者电话会议的录音。
最后是结论。
不要强迫大家参加这类活动,谁需要助眠用品,就提供给谁;让同事们私下交流睡眠经验,也是好事。
但是在深夜追踪员工的行为,侵犯隐私,给所有人强加统一的方案,也没有效果。
至于要不要在全公司推广,邮件的最后一句是:这件事,我们肯定得先睡一觉再说。
笑过之后,你也可以想一想:你的公司,如果开始关心你的睡眠,你会高兴,还是会紧张?
English transcript reference

Let's be clear up front: today's story is a satirical piece, but quite a lot of what it pokes fun at is real.

Britain's Economist has a workplace column called Bartleby that chronicles the many torments of office life.

This week's column took the form of a fictional internal company email, titled "Sleep like a pro".

It's written in the voice of an earnest, slightly overconfident manager reporting to colleagues on the results of a sleep project.

The background: a senior executive named Stew is passionate about his own sleep routine and is always telling people how important rest is.

On top of that, research from other industries has long shown that lack of sleep has many negative effects.

So the company rolled out a series of pilot projects for its team in Canada and its global legal function, aiming to leave every colleague energized.

The first project, called "Waking Hours", had volunteers try pre-industrial sleep patterns.

They got up at two in the morning, worked for two hours, then went back for a second sleep.

This premise wasn't invented out of thin air.

Virginia Tech historian Roger Ekirch found more than five hundred references in diaries, court records and medical texts.

These records show that before industrialization, people often slept a "first sleep", woke for about an hour in the middle of the night to pray, chat or do some chores, then slept a "second sleep".

He argues that as home and street lighting spread, this segmented sleep gradually disappeared, and by the 1920s almost nobody mentioned it any more.

But at the company in the column, history was far less romantic.

Some employees adapted to the new rhythm; others could never get back to sleep and were so exhausted their brains stopped working.

One salesperson began his second sleep halfway through a client meeting, and a big order was lost just like that.

Even more unexpected was the chain reaction.

Senior people started sending emails and work messages at 3am, so younger employees who weren't in the trial began getting up earlier to reply promptly.

They got busy before dawn, which in turn pushed even more colleagues to start work early.

Once that cascade effect is taken into account, sleep quality across the company went down, not up.

The idea was to help everyone sleep more; instead, everyone slept less.

The second project sent participants all kinds of sleep trackers: rings, wristbands, watches — you name it.

One-fifth of colleagues couldn't get the devices to work at all; the email said this showed a worrying level of tech skills, and the company is launching a separate training course to fix it.

The real problem was the data.

Many people felt perfectly rested — until their device told them last night had been terrible.

Others were told they'd slept like a baby, when in fact they'd lain awake all night worrying about the quality of their sleep.

This part, too, has a basis in reality.

In 2017, sleep researchers at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago described several patients in the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine.

They were so fixated on the scores from their trackers that the anxiety kept them awake, and they even distrusted normal results from hospital sleep studies.

The researchers gave the condition a name, which in Chinese you could render as "perfect-sleep anxiety disorder".

Back to the column.

The data also showed that many employees were sleeping during the day, and that the entire senior leadership team seemed to have nodded off together in a recent meeting.

The email's only comment: of course that cannot be true.

Other small interventions had mixed results.

Several colleagues wearing eye masks woke in the night thinking they had been kidnapped, and got a terrible fright.

One petite colleague was pinned under a weighted blanket, couldn't crawl out, and in the end had to be freed by the fire brigade.

The magnesium trial went worse: due to an error, people were told to take far more than the recommended dose, and since magnesium works as a laxative, the trial had to be voided.

People found lavender spray and herbal tea pleasant enough, but they didn't noticeably help sleep.

A colleague in the legal team accidentally sprayed lavender in his own face and went to hospital for a check-up; related litigation is ongoing.

So the email solemnly recommends: never again use lawyers as guinea pigs in any pilot project.

The sleep tips colleagues shared on their own, however, were very practical — like listening to audio versions of World Bank publications, athletes' post-match interviews, and every investor conference call ever recorded.

Finally, the conclusion.

Don't force people to take part in this kind of thing; provide sleep aids to whoever needs them, and letting colleagues swap sleep advice informally is a good idea too.

But tracking employees' behavior in the dead of night invades their privacy, and imposing a one-size-fits-all solution on everyone doesn't work.

As for rolling it out across the company, the email's final line is: this is something we should definitely sleep on first.

Once you've stopped laughing, think about it: if your company started caring about your sleep, would you be glad, or nervous?

Listen again

Try it without the transcript and notice what sounds clearer.

What vocabulary does this episode teach?

词汇
zhìliàngquality

HSK 4. 整个公司的睡眠质量不升反降.

xiàoguǒeffect, result

HSK 4. 其他小措施的效果有好有坏.

jiànyìto recommend; suggestion

HSK 4. 邮件因此郑重建议 — never use lawyers as guinea pigs.

yǐngxiǎngeffect, influence

HSK 3. 睡眠不足会带来很多负面影响.

xíguànhabit

HSK 3. 对自己的睡眠习惯非常热情 — Stew, the true believer.

jiǎnchácheck-up, examination

HSK 3. 不相信医院睡眠检查给出的正常结果.

fěngcìsatire; to satirize

今天这个故事是一篇讽刺文章 — said in the first line so no joke is taken as fact.

xūgòufictional

一封虚构的公司内部邮件 — the column's format.

zhìyuànzhěvolunteer

让志愿者尝试工业化以前的睡眠方式.

zhuīzōngto track

睡眠追踪设备 / 在深夜追踪员工的行为.

jiāolǜanxiety

焦虑到失眠 — the patients in the 2017 study.

qīnfànto violate, invade

侵犯隐私 — invading privacy.

* beyond level超纲词

What grammar patterns appear in this episode?

语法

不升反降

Instead of rising, it fell — a four-character pattern (不A反B) for an outcome that went the wrong way.

把这种扩散效应算进去,整个公司的睡眠质量不升反降。

随着……,……逐渐……

As X changed, Y gradually… — formal cause over time.

他认为,随着家庭照明和街道照明越来越普及,这种分段睡眠逐渐消失,到二十世纪二十年代几乎没人再提。

由于……,……

Formal "due to": gives the cause first.

镁片试验更惨,由于一个失误,公司让大家服用了远超推荐量的剂量,而镁有通便作用,这项试验只好作废。

Proper nouns

专有名词
《经济学人》JīngjìxuérénThe Economist巴托比BātuōbǐBartleby (the column)斯图SītúStew罗杰·埃克奇Luójié ĀikèqíRoger Ekirch弗吉尼亚理工大学Fújíníyà Lǐgōng DàxuéVirginia Tech拉什大学医学中心Lāshí Dàxué Yīxué ZhōngxīnRush University Medical Center芝加哥ZhījiāgēChicago加拿大JiānádàCanada世界银行Shìjiè Yínhángthe World Bank

Free account

Keep learning from this story

Create a free account to keep saved words and your preferred level together.

  • Keep words with their story context
  • Remember your preferred level
  • Build your vocabulary over time

Keep learning