A Chinese podcast · Same story, 4 levels
LinkedIn 加了一个"这看着像 AI 写的"按钮。三个星期，被点了一百万次。
LinkedIn Added a "Seems Like AI Slop" Button. It Was Clicked a Million Times in Three Weeks.
About this story
LinkedIn Added a "Seems Like AI Slop" Button. It Was Clicked a Million Times in Three Weeks. HSK 2 Chinese listening practice.
This is an HSK 2 Chinese listening episode that runs about 2 minutes. The full Mandarin script is shown with tap-for-pinyin and a line-by-line English translation, so you can listen and read at once — comprehensible input in the sense of Stephen Krashen's i+1 theory. It teaches 7 key vocabulary words such as 读、字、觉得 and walks through 2 grammar patterns, each explained in English with examples. The same news story is retold at 4 difficulty levels — use the level selector above to find the version that is challenging but still understandable for you.
Read at your level
原文Read the complete story in Chinese. Reveal pinyin and English only when you need them.
English transcript reference
First, about the website LinkedIn.
On LinkedIn, people write posts: about their work, about things they have thought of, about what they got done this year.
In the past these posts were all written by people.
These last few years, that has changed.
Now there are a lot of posts on LinkedIn written by AI, not by people.
When you read one you may not be able to tell, because it looks perfectly normal.
A post written by AI looks like a normal post too.
But when you finish it you feel as though you have seen it somewhere before.
The sentences are fine, the words are not wrong, and yet it has no flavour.
On the thirtieth of July, LinkedIn did something.
They added a button under every post — a very small button.
What it says is: this seems like AI wrote it.
You see a post, you think a machine wrote it, and you press it.
Pressing it is reporting it.
Three weeks later a number came out — a very big number.
One million.
One million times.
In three weeks, that button was pressed more than a million times.
Was pressing it any use?
LinkedIn says it was.
They put the reports together with their own judgement and changed the system.
The result: for content judged to be AI-written, forty percent fewer people saw it.
Forty percent fewer is a very large change.
And there is another number that is more surprising still.
A company called Pangram Labs looked at a lot of the longer posts on LinkedIn.
Out of a hundred, forty-one were entirely generated by AI.
Not a person writing and AI tidying it up — AI from beginning to end.
So that button is not just a button.
A million people pressing it are all saying the same sentence:
I do not want to see this kind of thing any more.
And the interesting part is that nobody taught anyone how to tell.
There was no class, and nobody explained it.
People simply read, and read, and felt something was off.
Think about it:
You read an article — can you tell whether a machine wrote it?
Listen again
Try it without the transcript and notice what sounds clearer.
What vocabulary does this episode teach?
词汇你读的时候，可能看不出来。
句子都对，字也没错 — the sentences are fine, the words are not wrong.
The whole mechanism is people 觉得 something is off.
三个星期里，被点了一百多万次。
A very small one, added under every post.
The standard word for a post on a forum or social platform.
点一下，就是举报 — pressing it is reporting it.
* beyond level超纲词
What grammar patterns appear in this episode?
语法看不出来
Cannot tell by looking. The 出来 complement means "work it out".
你读的时候，可能看不出来。 — Reading it, you may not be able to tell.
不是……，是……
Not X, but Y — corrects the expected description.
不是人写完 AI 改一改，是从头到尾都是 AI 写的。
Proper Nouns
专有名词Sources
来源Free account
Keep learning from this story
Create a free account to keep saved words and your preferred level together.
- Keep words with their story context
- Remember your preferred level
- Build your vocabulary over time