Fluentide

A Chinese podcast · Same story, 4 levels

Nepal–Tibet Glacier Collapse Mimics Earthquake — episode cover art
3:43

尼泊尔和西藏之间的冰川塌了。仪器上那个四点四级的地震,其实是山掉下来的声音。

Nepal–Tibet Glacier Collapse Mimics Earthquake

About this story

Nepal–Tibet Glacier Collapse Mimics Earthquake. HSK 5-6 Chinese listening practice.

This is an HSK 5-6 Chinese listening episode that runs about 4 minutes. The full Mandarin script is shown with tap-for-pinyin and a line-by-line English translation, so you can listen and read at once — comprehensible input in the sense of Stephen Krashen's i+1 theory. It teaches 6 key vocabulary words such as 原因、结果、数字 and walks through 3 grammar patterns, each explained in English with examples. The same news story is retold at 4 difficulty levels — use the level selector above to find the version that is challenging but still understandable for you.

Read at your level

原文

Read the complete story in Chinese. Reveal pinyin and English only when you need them.

先把顺序说清楚,因为这条新闻里最值得记住的,就是顺序。
上个星期三,早上八点四十分,尼泊尔和西藏之间的山谷里,出事了。
出事的地方,是一座叫朗塘的山,山上,有冰川。
那天早上,冰川末端的一大块冰,在五千二百米的高度上,脱离了山体。
它垂直往下,掉了一千二百米,才落到谷底。
一千二百米,是什么概念?
比世界上最高的那座楼,都还要高。
一块这么大的冰往下走,不会,只带自己下去。
它一路上把岩石,泥沙,全部裹了进来。
落到底部之后,这一整团东西,冲进了,西藏境内的一条河。
接下来发生的事,是整件事最要命的一步。
那些冰和石头,把河道,堵死了。
河水过不去,就在上游停住,越积越高,形成了一个堰塞湖。
这里要说清楚,那不是一道真正的坝。
那只是一堆刚刚砸下来的碎石,中间全是缝。
它撑不了多久,后来,它溃了。
积了不知道多久的水,在极短的时间里,一次性冲了下去。
下游,有很多人。
那一带是很有名的徒步路线,每年都有大量外国人,专门过来走。
截至目前,尼泊尔已确认接近四百人遇难。
另有六百多名游客失联,他们来自,三十四个国家。
西藏一侧,也有五百多人失联。
这些数字每天都在变,而且几乎只往一个方向变。
下面说这条新闻里,最容易被人搞反的一件事。
那天早上,全球的地震台网,都记录到一个四点四级的信号。
所以最早的一批报道是这样写的:先发生了地震,地震震塌了冰川。
这个顺序听上去非常合理,符合我们对灾难的直觉。
后来美国地质调查局改了说法。
他们说,那天,根本没有地震。
仪器捕捉到的那个信号,是滑坡本身发出来的。
一座山的一角掉下来,量级大到可以让全球的地震仪,一起,动一下。
最初被读成四点四级的那个信号,后来被重新计算成了五点二级。
你看出来了吗,这里的顺序,被颠倒了。
不是地震把冰川震了下来。
是冰川掉下来,做出了,一个地震的样子。
在这件事里,地震不是原因,是结果。
那么,科学家是怎么把顺序摆正的?
靠卫星照片,而且是等了一天的卫星照片。
出事当天的图像基本没用,被云层,和扬起来的灰,挡得严严实实。
第二天云散了,他们才看清楚一件更关键的事:
塌下来的,不只是冰。
冰底下的那块岩石,也,一起塌了。
换句话说,冰不是自己滑走的。
是撑着冰的地基先松了,冰,是跟着地基一起掉下去的。
这就把问题推到了更深的一层:那块岩石,为什么会松。
科学家目前的回答,很克制。
他们说,现在还太早,不能直接把这一次的事,算到气候变化头上。
这是一句,非常不解气的话。
但它也提醒我们,这条新闻里唯一被证明的顺序,是冰在前,地震在后。
你想一想:
我们看到一件事的时候,为什么常常会把原因和结果,弄反?
English transcript reference

Get the order straight first, because the order is the part of this story most worth remembering.

Last Wednesday, at 8:40 in the morning, something happened in a valley between Nepal and Tibet.

It happened at a mountain called Langtang, and there is a glacier on it.

That morning, a huge block of ice at the glacier’s lower end came away from the mountain at a height of 5,200 metres.

It fell straight down 1,200 metres before it reached the valley floor.

What does 1,200 metres mean?

It is higher than the tallest building in the world.

A block of ice that size does not come down alone.

On the way down it swept up rock and silt, all of it.

When the whole mass reached the bottom, it drove into a river inside Tibet.

What happened next is the deadliest step in the whole thing.

That ice and rock sealed the river channel.

The water could not get past. It stopped upstream, rising higher and higher, and formed a landslide lake.

To be clear: that was not a real dam.

It was a heap of freshly fallen rubble, full of gaps.

It could not hold for long, and then it broke.

Water that had been piling up for who knows how long went down all at once, in a very short time.

Downstream, there were many people.

That area is a well-known trekking route, and every year large numbers of foreigners come specifically to walk it.

As of now, Nepal has confirmed close to four hundred dead.

Another six hundred trekkers are unaccounted for, from thirty-four countries.

On the Tibet side, more than five hundred people are also missing.

These numbers change every day, and almost only in one direction.

Now the part of this story people most easily get backwards.

That morning, seismic networks around the world all recorded a magnitude 4.4 signal.

So the first wave of reports was written this way: first there was an earthquake, and the earthquake shook the glacier down.

That order sounds entirely reasonable. It matches our instinct about disasters.

Then the United States Geological Survey changed what it said.

They said there had been no earthquake at all that day.

The signal the instruments caught was given off by the landslide itself.

One corner of a mountain coming down was large enough to move seismometers worldwide, all at once.

The signal first read as a 4.4 was later recalculated as a 5.2.

Do you see it? The order here has been inverted.

It was not the earthquake that shook the glacier down.

It was the glacier coming down, doing an impression of an earthquake.

In this event, the earthquake is not the cause. It is the result.

So how did the scientists put the order back the right way round?

From satellite photographs — and from photographs they had to wait a day for.

The images from the day itself were basically useless, blocked solid by cloud and the dust thrown up.

On the second day the cloud cleared, and they could see something more important:

It was not only ice that came down.

The block of rock underneath the ice came down too.

In other words, the ice did not slide away on its own.

The ground holding the ice loosened first, and the ice went down with the ground.

Which pushes the question one layer deeper: why did that rock loosen?

The scientists’ answer for now is restrained.

They say it is still too early to put this particular event down to climate change.

That is a deeply unsatisfying sentence.

But it also reminds us that the only order proven in this story is: the ice first, the earthquake after.

Think about it:

When we watch something happen, why do we so often get the cause and the result the wrong way round?

Listen again

Try it without the transcript and notice what sounds clearer.

What vocabulary does this episode teach?

词汇
yuányīncause

地震不是原因,是结果 — the earthquake is not the cause, it is the result.

jiéguǒresult

The other half of the pair this whole episode turns on.

shùzìnumber, figure

这些数字每天都在变 — these numbers change every day.

jīhūalmost, nearly

几乎只往一个方向变 — changing almost only in one direction.

bīngchuānglacier

冰川末端的一大块冰 — a huge block of ice at the glacier’s lower end.

yùnànto die in a disaster

已确认接近四百人遇难 — close to four hundred confirmed dead. The formal word used in disaster reporting.

* beyond level超纲词

What grammar patterns appear in this episode?

语法

截至目前

"As of now" — the standard formula for a figure that is still moving.

截至目前,尼泊尔已确认接近四百人遇难。 — As of now, Nepal has confirmed close to four hundred dead.

把 A 算到 B 头上

To put A down to B, to lay it at B’s door. Idiomatic and slightly accusatory.

不能直接把这一次的事,算到气候变化头上。 — You cannot simply put this event down to climate change.

换句话说

"In other words" — restates the point more plainly.

换句话说,冰不是自己滑走的。 — In other words, the ice did not slide away on its own.

Proper nouns

专有名词
尼泊尔Níbó'ěrNepal西藏XīzàngTibet朗塘LǎngtángLangtang, the Himalayan peak whose glacier collapsed美国地质调查局Měiguó Dìzhì Diàochájúthe United States Geological Survey (USGS)

Sources

来源

Free account

Keep learning from this story

Create a free account to keep saved words and your preferred level together.

  • Keep words with their story context
  • Remember your preferred level
  • Build your vocabulary over time

Keep learning