Fluentide

A Chinese podcast · Same story, 4 levels

What Happened to the Neanderthals? Why Homo Sapiens Is the Only Human Species Left — episode cover art
7:02

尼安德特人:为什么只剩下我们?

What Happened to the Neanderthals? Why Homo Sapiens Is the Only Human Species Left

About this story

Why Neanderthals, Denisovans and Homo floresiensis vanished while Homo sapiens survived — new evidence on their tools, art, genes and pure luck. HSK 5+ Chinese listening practice.

This is an HSK 5+ Chinese listening episode that runs about 7 minutes. The full Mandarin script is shown with tap-for-pinyin and a line-by-line English translation, so you can listen and read at once — comprehensible input in the sense of Stephen Krashen's i+1 theory. It teaches 12 key vocabulary words such as 历史、发现、研究 and walks through 7 grammar patterns, each explained in English with examples. The same news story is retold at 4 difficulty levels — use the level selector above to find the version that is challenging but still understandable for you.

Read at your level

原文

Read the complete story in Chinese. Reveal pinyin and English only when you need them.

今天,世界上有八十亿人。
他们都是一种人。
可是,人的历史不是这样的。
七百万年以来,人的样子有很多种。
十万年以前,世界上还住着很多种人。
尼安德特人在欧洲和亚洲的西部。
丹尼索瓦人在亚洲。
弗洛勒斯人住在印度尼西亚的一个岛上。
直立人刚刚在爪哇消失。
我们智人,只是其中的一种。
所以,今天只有一种人,这不是正常的事。
这是一个很奇怪的时候。
伦敦的一位研究者说:为什么只剩下我们?
别的人,都去了哪里?
很多年以来,人们有一个很简单的答案。
人的历史,像一把梯子。
最高的一层,是我们。
下面,是别的人。
我们的脑子大,我们的东西好,我们的社会复杂。
所以他们没有了。
这是应该的。
我们是故事的结尾。
1980年代,很多人相信这个答案。
有一位研究者说:那时候,人们觉得别的人都很野蛮。
我们活下来,因为我们最厉害。
但是,新的发现让这个故事变了。
尼安德特人不是站在半路的动物。
十九世纪,人们第一次看见他们的骨头。
那时候,科学家觉得,他们离猴子不远。
今天我们知道,他们离我们很近。
有一位研究者说:他们已经走了百分之九十五的路。
他们会用火。
他们会打很大的动物。
他们会找植物吃,也许还会用植物做药。
他们会在山洞的墙上画东西。
他们会照顾生病和不能走的人。
他们甚至会做很像牙医的事。
这些都说明,他们的生活和我们的生活,没有我们想的那么远。
在法国,有一个布鲁尼凯尔洞。
十七万六千五百年以前,一群尼安德特人走进了这个山洞。
山洞很深,没有太阳。
他们带来了火,也带来了做火的东西。
他们用四百个断了的石柱,做了几个圈。
最大的圈,有六米多宽。
这些石柱,一共有一百一十二米长。
它们离洞口,有三百三十六米。
做这些事,要计划,要说话,要很多人一起做。
伦敦的一位研究者说:这说明他们会想很复杂的事。
2010年,一位研究者在埃塞俄比亚找到了动物的骨头。
骨头上,有石头工具留下的痕迹。
这些骨头,有三百四十万年。
这个发现,把石头工具的时间往前推了八十万年。
做这件事的人,不是我们这样的人。
那时候,那里只有一种更早的人。
我们叫它南方古猿。
这个发现很有争议。
有的研究者说,那些痕迹可能不是石头工具留下的。
但是,它让很多人开始想:人的能力,不是从我们才开始的。
说回尼安德特人。
他们的能力,让一些研究者说:他们和我们一样。
但是,也有人觉得,这个说法走得太远了。
他们问:如果尼安德特人坐在纽约的地铁里,人们会看他吗?
有些人说:不会。
但是,也有人问:就算他们的文化和我们很像,这是不是他们在学我们?
还是我们在学他们?
我们很难知道。
2010年,尼安德特人的基因组发表了。
它来自克罗地亚的一个山洞。
这是我们第一次能读到他们的基因。
基因组说的第一件事,是他们没有直接变成我们。
第二件事:他们也没有完全消失。
他们和现代人的祖先,生下了孩子。
所以今天,非洲以外的人身上,大约百分之二的基因来自尼安德特人。
他们的一部分,还在我们身上。
基因还给出了一个时间。
两种人一起生孩子的时期,大约有七千年。
它开始于五万多年以前。
更细的研究说,是五万零五百年到四万三千五百年。
可是,空白比答案多。
那些相遇,是他们愿意的吗?
还是发生了暴力?
这些问题,今天还没有答案。
最近的一项研究说,混血有一个模式:尼安德特男人和现代女人。
但是,细节还是不很清楚。
普林斯顿的一位研究者说:我们还不知道的事,太多了。
他说,每次讲完,总有人问同一个问题。
他们和我们,到底在一起过多少次?
如果只有几次,那只是历史里的小故事。
如果是几千次,那就关系到我们是谁。
今天,科学家还在找。
他们在老鼠身上试这些基因。
也在实验室的细胞里试。
他们想知道:一个尼安德特人的基因,放进我们的身体,会做什么?
现在知道的,是它们和免疫、昼夜节律、身体的样子有关。
还有一项研究,看了三百多个古代人的基因组。
过去五万年的混血,就这样一点点显出来。
不过,基因只讲了一部分故事。
人有多少,天气怎么变,也很重要。
不管哪一种人,数量都不多。
天气又冷,变化又突然。
有些年份,尼安德特人过得不错。
有些年份,轮到我们。
还有些时候,两边的小群体都消失了,没有留下后代。
有一位研究者说,这里可能有运气的成分。
智人来自非洲。
我们的人口更多,住的地方也更暖。
他们的世界,冬天更长,也更难。
我们可能只是多了一点机会。
另一位研究者说:这大概只是运气。
天气好的时候,他们也能到那里。
他们试了一次又一次。
在整个冰期,我们一直在来。
除了运气,还有别的原因。
越来越多的研究者认为,答案不是一个新工具。
答案是一张网:面对病的能力,文化发展的速度,社会的智慧,还有建立联盟的能力。
这些,都很难在骨头和石头里看见。
很多细节,我们可能永远不会知道。
和人的好奇心比起来,过去留下的东西太少了。
每一个新的发现,都会带来更多的问题。
但是,有的研究者说,现在比任何时候都需要看我们的历史。
因为今天,我们面对很多生存的风险。
一位澳大利亚的研究者说:我们的物种,在地球上的时间不长。
所以,我们的生存,不是一定的事。
直立人在世界上,有一百多万年。
尼安德特人这段路,走了四十万年。
我们智人,大约只走了三十万年。
他说:我不觉得我们有多了不起。
从更大的角度看,我们什么都不是。
那么,我们是最后的赢家,还是下一个消失的人?
这个问题,今天还没有答案。
English transcript reference

Today, there are eight billion people in the world.

They are all one kind of human.

But the history of humans was not like this.

For seven million years, humans have taken many forms.

A hundred thousand years ago, many kinds of humans still lived in the world.

Neanderthals lived in Europe and western Asia.

Denisovans lived in Asia.

Homo floresiensis lived on an island in Indonesia.

Homo erectus had just disappeared in Java.

We Homo sapiens are only one of them.

So today there being only one kind of human is not a normal thing.

This is a very strange time.

A researcher in London said: Why are we the only ones left?

Where did all the others go?

For many years, people had a very simple answer.

Human history is like a ladder.

The highest rung is us.

Below are the others.

Our brains are big, our things are good, our society is complex.

So they are gone.

This is how it should be.

We are the end of the story.

In the 1980s, many people believed this answer.

A researcher said: Back then, people thought the others were all savage.

We survived because we were the strongest.

But new discoveries changed this story.

Neanderthals were not animals standing halfway up.

In the nineteenth century, people saw their bones for the first time.

At that time, scientists thought they were not far from monkeys.

Today we know they are very close to us.

A researcher said: They had already walked ninety-five percent of the road.

They could use fire.

They could hunt very large animals.

They could find plants to eat, and perhaps also use plants as medicine.

They could draw things on cave walls.

They could care for people who were sick or could not walk.

They could even do things very much like dentistry.

All of this shows that their lives and our lives are not as far apart as we thought.

In France, there is a cave called Bruniquel.

One hundred seventy-six thousand five hundred years ago, a group of Neanderthals walked into this cave.

The cave is very deep, with no sun.

They brought fire, and they also brought things for making fire.

They used four hundred broken stalagmites to make several circles.

The largest circle is more than six meters wide.

These stalagmites are one hundred and twelve meters long in total.

They are three hundred and thirty-six meters from the cave entrance.

Doing these things requires planning, talking, and many people working together.

A researcher in London said: This shows they could think about very complex things.

In 2010, a researcher found animal bones in Ethiopia.

On the bones were marks left by stone tools.

These bones are three point four million years old.

This discovery pushed the date of stone tools back by eight hundred thousand years.

The people who did this were not people like us.

At that time, there was only one earlier kind of human there.

We call it Australopithecus.

This discovery is very controversial.

Some researchers say those marks may not have been left by stone tools.

But it made many people start to think: human abilities did not begin with us.

Back to the Neanderthals.

Their abilities led some researchers to say: they are the same as us.

But others feel this claim goes too far.

They ask: If a Neanderthal sat on the New York subway, would people look at him?

Some people say: No.

But others ask: Even if their culture is very like ours, is this them learning from us?

Or is it us learning from them?

It is very hard for us to know.

In 2010, the Neanderthal genome was published.

It came from a cave in Croatia.

This was the first time we could read their genes.

The first thing the genome said is that they did not directly become us.

The second thing: they also did not completely disappear.

They had children with the ancestors of modern humans.

So today, people outside Africa have about two percent of their genes from Neanderthals.

A part of them is still in us.

The genes also gave a time.

The period when the two kinds of humans had children together was about seven thousand years.

It began more than fifty thousand years ago.

More detailed research says it was from fifty thousand five hundred to forty-three thousand five hundred years ago.

But there are more blanks than answers.

Were those meetings willing?

Or was there violence?

These questions still have no answers today.

A recent study said interbreeding had a pattern: Neanderthal men and modern women.

But the details are still not very clear.

A researcher at Princeton said: There is too much we still do not know.

He said that every time he finishes a talk, someone always asks the same question.

How many times were they and we actually together?

If it was only a few times, then it is just a small story in history.

If it was thousands of times, then it concerns who we are.

Today, scientists are still looking.

They test these genes in mice.

They also test them in cells in the lab.

They want to know: What does a Neanderthal gene do when it is put into our bodies?

What we know now is that they are related to immunity, circadian rhythms, and the shape of the body.

There is also a study that looked at the genomes of more than three hundred ancient people.

In this way, the interbreeding of the past fifty thousand years slowly emerged.

However, genes only tell part of the story.

How many people there were, and how the weather changed, are also very important.

No matter which kind of human, the numbers were not large.

The weather was cold, and the changes were sudden.

Some years, the Neanderthals did well.

Some years, it was our turn.

At other times, small groups on both sides disappeared, leaving no descendants.

A researcher said there may be an element of luck here.

Homo sapiens came from Africa.

We had more people, and we lived in warmer places.

Their world had longer winters and was harder.

We may simply have had a little more opportunity.

Another researcher said: This was probably just luck.

When the weather was good, they could get there too.

They tried again and again.

Throughout the ice age, we kept coming.

Besides luck, there are other reasons.

More and more researchers believe the answer is not a new tool.

The answer is a net: the ability to face disease, the speed of cultural development, social wisdom, and the ability to build alliances.

These are all very hard to see in bones and stones.

Many details we may never know.

Compared with human curiosity, what the past left behind is too little.

Every new discovery brings more questions.

But some researchers say that now, more than ever, we need to look at our history.

Because today, we face many risks to our survival.

An Australian researcher said: Our species has not been on Earth for long.

So our survival is not a certain thing.

Homo erectus was in the world for more than a million years.

The Neanderthals walked this road for four hundred thousand years.

We Homo sapiens have walked it for only about three hundred thousand years.

He said: I do not think we are so great.

From a bigger perspective, we are nothing.

So, are we the final winners, or the next to disappear?

This question still has no answer today.

Listen again

Try it without the transcript and notice what sounds clearer.

What vocabulary does this episode teach?

词汇
lìshǐhistory

HSK 3. 人的历史 — the history of humans; also 历史上 (in history).

fāxiàndiscovery; to discover

HSK 3. Used as both noun and verb: 新的发现 (new discoveries), 找到了 (found).

yánjiūresearch; to research

HSK 3. 研究者 (researcher), 一项研究 (a study) — common in science news.

xiāngxìnto believe

HSK 3. 很多人相信这个答案 — many people believed this answer.

fùzácomplex; complicated

HSK 4. 社会复杂 (society is complex); opposite 简单.

gōngjùtool

HSK 4. 石头工具 (stone tools); measure word 件/种.

wùzhǒngspecies

HSK 5. 我们的物种 (our species); biology term common in news.

nénglìability; capability

HSK 4. 人的能力 (human ability); often with 有/没有.

dá'ànanswer; solution

HSK 4. 一个很简单的答案 — a very simple answer; 没有答案 (no answer).

xiāoshīto disappear; to vanish

HSK 4. 完全消失 (completely disappear); used for species dying out.

jīyīngene

HSK 4. 基因组 (genome), 基因来自尼安德特人 (genes from Neanderthals).

kēxuéjiāscientist

HSK 4. 科学家觉得 — scientists thought; 科学家还在找 (scientists are still looking).

* beyond level超纲词

What grammar patterns appear in this episode?

语法

像 + Noun + 一样 / 像 + Noun

Expresses similarity: 'like' or 'similar to'. 像一把梯子 means 'like a ladder'.

人的历史,像一把梯子。

他们甚至会做很像牙医的事。

不是……而是…… / 不是……是……

Contrast structure correcting a mistaken assumption: 'not X, but Y'.

做这件事的人,不是我们这样的人。

越来越 + Adjective/Verb↗

Means 'more and more'. Indicates a gradual increase over time.

越来越多的研究者认为,答案不是一个新工具。

把 + Object + Verb + Complement↗

The 把 construction moves the object before the verb to show a result or displacement.

这个发现,把石头工具的时间往前推了八十万年。

和……比起来

Means 'compared with'. Used to set up a comparison between two things.

和人的好奇心比起来,过去留下的东西太少了。

就算……也……

Concessive: 'even if..., still...'. Introduces a hypothetical that does not change the conclusion.

就算他们的文化和我们很像,这是不是他们在学我们?

是……还是……↗

Presents two alternatives in a question: 'is it X or Y?'

那么,我们是最后的赢家,还是下一个消失的人?

还是发生了暴力?

Proper nouns

专有名词
尼安德特人Ní'āndétè rénNeanderthals丹尼索瓦人Dānnísuǒwǎ rénDenisovans弗洛勒斯人Fúluòlèsī rénHomo floresiensis直立人Zhílì rénHomo erectus智人ZhìrénHomo sapiens南方古猿Nánfāng gǔyuánAustralopithecus欧洲ŌuzhōuEurope亚洲YàzhōuAsia印度尼西亚YìndùníxīyàIndonesia爪哇ZhǎowāJava伦敦LúndūnLondon法国FǎguóFrance布鲁尼凯尔洞Bùlǔníkǎi'ěr dòngBruniquel Cave埃塞俄比亚Āisāi'ébǐyàEthiopia克罗地亚KèluódìyàCroatia纽约NiǔyuēNew York普林斯顿PǔlínsīdùnPrinceton非洲FēizhōuAfrica澳大利亚ÀodàlìyàAustralia

Sources

来源

Free account

Keep learning from this story

Create a free account to keep saved words and your preferred level together.

  • Keep words with their story context
  • Remember your preferred level
  • Build your vocabulary over time

Keep learning